| Heat seaking Fire Hoses needed |
by plblark |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
Ok, here's the setup:
I do not smoke, but used to a long time ago, so I understand the cravings...
My work has two smoking sections: one around the corner from the top level exit of the parking garage, and one half way from the underground parking ramp exit door to the exit from the ramp...
When it gets cold, those pestilence carrying smokers drift ever closer to the doors... The net effect: Everything smells like ash!
They light up before they're even out the doors. They drift slowly towards the ash tray, stopping at each car for conversation and incidentally leaving all the cars smelling of ash. They light another one at the ash tray and wander back in... polluting all the way ...
Then, everyone who walks in has to walk through the haze of their stench. Then, they come to the elevator and their tar stench gets trapped there and I suffer. After that, maybe in a fit of remorse for the amount of time they waste smoking every day, they stop at the first desk they come to and discuss siomething... still reaking of ash... arrgghhh I hate smokers some days!
I wish we had one of these: Smoke collectors |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I am biased of course | by scissors | 2003-12-19 06:37:05 |
|
Hmm... | by fudje | 2003-12-19 06:44:17 |
|
If caught, you will go to jail (n/t) | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:08:05 |
|
and rightly so. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:30:53 |
|
Does it snow where you are? (n/t) | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 06:46:30 |
|
yes, and the cold makes the smoke cling (n/t) | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:43:37 |
|
Aren't you satisfied that | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 06:54:44 |
|
Right back at ya', | by fudje | 2003-12-19 07:24:24 |
|
Making them walk out into a blizzard | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 07:52:36 |
|
As I said before, | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 08:18:13 |
|
Smoking is not illegal | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:39:25 |
|
smokers are infringing on my health | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:46:24 |
|
BTW: in Minnesota, Smoking in a public place IS | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:47:37 |
|
No more harsh than BV | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:52:24 |
|
missed reference: BV (n/t) | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:53:16 |
|
He means me. BV ->BloodyViking. (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:35:33 |
|
Found it. thoufh I was looking for a locale | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:42:36 |
|
I am not kicking them. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:55:50 |
|
That's just as insensitive as | by Slamlander | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You're correct. My approach was wrong | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:28:29 |
|
Thank you, for seeing the point | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:54:28 |
|
but the apathy is horrendous | by plblark | 2003-12-19 11:01:02 |
|
I often see people smoking | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 11:16:35 |
|
You are correct | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 13:24:21 |
|
Wrong again. | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I agree about the perfume. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:55:19 |
|
They are entitled because | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 13:34:36 |
|
Owe? Owe? | by Bellator | 2003-12-19 14:22:17 |
|
This in the USA context | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 16:54:08 |
|
Where did you get That figure? | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-22 06:11:24 |
|
We aren't Making them do that, | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 07:36:02 |
|
Give them a warm protected place | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 07:51:03 |
|
Why should any company | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 08:15:55 |
|
Rationalize it all you want to | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:32:04 |
|
I think personal bias is creeping in. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 08:50:52 |
|
You are exagerating muchly | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 08:57:08 |
|
so, since I don't want their pollution in my space | by plblark | 2003-12-19 09:12:55 |
|
Absolut, there's plenty of exageration | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:38:43 |
|
It has been building for much longer then that | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:02:07 |
|
As I said, plenty of exageration .. | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:11:39 |
|
I know what I said to be true as stated. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:20:44 |
|
Can we please try to separate the two issues? | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:17:09 |
|
They both relate directly to smoking | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:24:54 |
|
Wrong again. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:59:25 |
|
But it's not a proven effect | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:06:11 |
|
Show where my logic is flawed. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:33:01 |
|
What "used to be" is irrelevant. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 09:54:44 |
|
Aha! The worst form of convert | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:03:34 |
|
Ahem. I will have to disagree with you there. | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:11:05 |
|
What blew their credibility with me | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:32:23 |
|
I've never seen a study that claimed that. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:34:43 |
|
Seriously screwed up indeed. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:42:03 |
|
I might point out that, in Los Angeles | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:57:42 |
|
but the smoking can't help. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 11:02:34 |
|
It is sad, but not really relevant. (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 11:09:50 |
|
Yes it is because | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 13:46:31 |
|
Ah, statistics. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-22 06:45:07 |
|
You have failed to show any flaw in my logic. | by BloodyViking | 2003-12-19 10:19:22 |
|
Unprotected cold? | by Bellator | 2003-12-19 07:39:24 |
|
And what's more | by scissors | 2003-12-19 07:44:48 |
|
Protected cold | by kelli217 | 2003-12-19 11:14:13 |
|
How about some of ... | by ChuckAB | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Someone working for me | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:12:46 |
|
a case study | by plblark | 2003-12-19 09:23:44 |
|
Works for me but, | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:44:58 |
|
yes, but the policy was unfair | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:14:57 |
|
Exactly and therefore | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 10:27:06 |
|
I agree re: enforced break times | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:47:35 |
|
Smoking: the Real WMD | by plblark | 2003-12-19 09:10:00 |
|
ENOUGH ALREADY! | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 09:50:31 |
|
I might add that | by Slamlander | 2003-12-19 09:56:18 |
|
you would be correct there | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:12:32 |
|
Aha. Thanks. a reasoned conversation | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:11:51 |
|
{{{plblark}}} | by LurkerMo | 2003-12-19 10:31:39 |
|
Not really. | by plblark | 2003-12-19 10:37:14 |