UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

An Issue of Responsibility	by Illiad	2003-11-06 08:30:47
IMO no.	by LurkerMo	2003-11-06 08:40:19
Hang on....	by Ravenlock	2003-11-06 09:36:40
But,	by buddha	2003-11-06 09:44:51
I'm not talking about what "has"...	by Ravenlock	2003-11-06 09:53:45
Even taking abortion out of the picture	by buddha	2003-11-06 10:05:45
Again, legally, he does not have that choice.	by Ravenlock	2003-11-06 10:10:50
Ethically, the child could not exist without that	by LurkerMo	2003-11-06 11:02:01
particular father. Realistically, it is the woman that has to carry the baby to term. He has nothing to do with it. Consider the situation where a woman gets sperm from an anonymous donor. I don't think that you would hold the father responsible for bringing up the child in this case, would you? And yet the only two differences are, that the woman indicated the choice to get pregnant (with donor sperm) and whether the father is known. With an unplanned pregnancy it is still possible for the woman to choose whether to carry to term. So the difference is very small there. So why should the fact that the woman knows who the father is obligate him to support the child?
[ Reply ]
Thinking about it	by buddha	2003-11-06 13:32:48
;-) (n/t)	by LurkerMo	2003-11-06 15:59:57

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)