UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

The Right Reverend Bush is at it again	by Blackbyrd2	2006-11-19 12:55:59
I don't buy the "woman's life at risk" argument	by crash_	2003-11-06 05:28:35
Why force a woman to undergo major surgery	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 06:00:22
So it can grow up and be president someday?	by NOLAWitch	2003-11-06 06:04:53
Anti-abortion != religion, fundamentalism.	by walkon	2003-11-06 06:53:45
But religion, fundamentalism == anti-abortion.	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 07:09:43
Then what's the standard?	by walkon	2003-11-06 08:33:10
For a number of reasons.	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 09:17:38
Logic and science support my position for one thing. Life (in the sense that abortion opponents use) has not been proven to begin at conception. A fetus is no more alive than a cancer. And if said fetus is having or will have the same effects on the mother as a tumor, should be treated as such. Secondarily, the position that fetus remains a fetus until birth imposes onerous restrictions on no one. The banning of medical procedures on the other hand does. Quickening is traditionally a threshold for viability, but even after that event the decision to continue with the pregnancy or abort is a medical one and should be between the woman and her physician. The fact that abortion opponents can't seem to distinguish between a living, breathing human being and a collection of cells that contain human DNA flabbergasts me. I do apologize for being flippant. However, abortion is often used when there are problems with the pregnancy, either deformities in the fetus or a pregnancy that threatens the mother's mental or physical health.
[ Reply ]
But... Those reasons would only convice someone	by walkon	2003-11-06 09:51:33
That's not something you're going to find.	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 11:27:32
If that standard doesn't exist,	by walkon	2003-11-06 12:50:46
They don't have a place in the public debate	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 14:23:30
Are we going in circles?	by walkon	2003-11-06 14:53:04
You're doing the sidestepping.	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 15:23:40
OK...	by walkon	2003-11-06 16:17:06
Just in case you check back....	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-06 19:07:02
And in case you do.	by walkon	2003-11-07 00:39:33
Breaking this up..	by thewrongcrowd	2003-11-07 07:57:31

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)