|
Matrix Revolutions Spoiler Party, take 2! | by Buffy_Fett | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
spoiler (as you well know) | by McGowan | 2003-11-06 07:31:28 |
|
nonono (still spoiled) (kinda smelly) | by amish | 2003-11-06 07:45:54 |
|
forgot to finish a sentence heh (still spoiled) | by amish | 2003-11-06 07:48:59 |
|
so how does he have powers outside of the matrix? (n/t) | by McGowan | 2003-11-06 07:50:15 |
|
because its in the script | by amish | 2003-11-06 08:04:40 |
| Arg! |
by harold |
2003-11-06 08:20:56 |
Smith was able to take over a human body because he messed with the mind that was in the body. Bane was jacked in, Smith converted him, Bane jacked out. It was basically reprogramming his brain like Smith had done with everybody else. Remember from the first movie that if you die in the matrix, that's your mind dying and your body can't live without a mind. In this case, the body lives because there's still a mind there, it's just someone else's mind.
Also, Smith had no contact with Bane's body. It was the representation of his body in the matrix. He wasn't interfacing with a human by touching the human, he was interfacing with a human by changing some code. The humans provide the interface between themselves and the machines by jacking in.
The best analogy would probably be an EEPROM. You plug the thing into a reader/programmer connected to a computer. It's got its own program loaded. You may write the name of what's on it on a label if you want to. You can read that program. When removed and plugged into something else, it acts like itself based on that program. If you plug it into the reader/programmer and load up a program, it now behaves according to the new program even if you wrote the old program name on the outside. Not just anything can change that program. The matrix is the reader/programmer, Bane is the EEPROM and Smith is the application thatmade use of the reader/programmer's functionality. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I agree. | by skeptic | 2003-11-06 09:56:31 |
|
Bad Analogy (beats dead horse) | by amish | 2003-11-06 12:40:19 |
|
Well, she weighs more than a duck! (n/t) | by skeptic | 2003-11-06 13:02:21 |
|
How did you come by this conclusion? | by skeptic | 2003-11-06 13:52:25 |
