The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Question: by Egaeus2003-11-06 04:52:16
  If you don't HAVE to, then don't. XP looks to me by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 05:50:43
    There's nothing wrong with XP. by nin_man 2003-11-06 06:00:51
In fact, if you were to switch the views back to "Classic" mode, you couldn't really tell a difference between it and 2000.

Older drivers will, for the most part, work. All that will happen is that you might get a message saying that the driver hasn't been digitally signed by Microsoft, and then the install will go on its merry way. If XP drivers aren't available, then you can still download and run 2000 drivers with nary a bump on your way.

Really, I don't know why all this anti-XP talk. There's really nothing wrong with it. If anything, I like it the best of any Windows I've used. It's quicker, more stable, has enough built-in so that there's no need to have to buy ten extra programs to use even the newest computer, and is a network administrator's dream for the users on his network to use.

If your company is headed for Server 2003, there's a fair amount of functionality that's only available if the end users are on XP. That's not greed; it's a simple matter of timeline. 2003 is based on XP, so things it can do just weren't present in earlier versions of Windows.
[ Reply ]
      Similar to our experience at work. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:04:02
        Yeah, most of the problem... by nelzie2003-11-06 06:21:50
      I'm wondering now by Nessalc2003-11-06 07:45:41
        It's only for Serving by nelzie2003-11-06 08:20:49

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)