The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

The Right Reverend Bush is at it again by Blackbyrd22006-11-19 12:55:59
  I don't buy the "woman's life at risk" argument by crash_ 2003-11-06 05:28:35
If the abortion is late term enough to be considered partial birth, then a doctor is going to give the woman a C-section. I can't see any reason to have the baby enter the birth canal, terminate its life, and then dismember it to remove the body. If giving birth would be dangerous to the mother, then what good is a partial birth abortion going to do? With a C-Section, both the mother and the baby have a chance for survival. So there is an out there. Its just not the convenient "final solution" that some folks want.

Abortions for the mother's safety earlier in the pregnancy make sense, just not late term. Just my opinion, but it sounds like the Pro Choice folks are just using that as an excuse to change their minds about being mothers at the last minute.
[ Reply ]
    That's not a very fair accusation. by skeptic2003-11-06 05:50:33
      I'm going to go through this thread and reply by altordwm2003-11-06 06:26:32
    Why force a woman to undergo major surgery by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:00:22
      So it can grow up and be president someday? by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 06:04:53
        Yes. Yes it could.* by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:09:44
        Anti-abortion != religion, fundamentalism. by walkon2003-11-06 06:53:45
          But religion, fundamentalism == anti-abortion. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 07:09:43
            Then what's the standard? by walkon2003-11-06 08:33:10
              For a number of reasons. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 09:17:38
                But... Those reasons would only convice someone by walkon2003-11-06 09:51:33
                  That's not something you're going to find. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 11:27:32
                    If that standard doesn't exist, by walkon2003-11-06 12:50:46
                      They don't have a place in the public debate by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 14:23:30
                        Are we going in circles? by walkon2003-11-06 14:53:04
                          You're doing the sidestepping. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 15:23:40
                            OK... by walkon2003-11-06 16:17:06
                              Just in case you check back.... by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 19:07:02
                                And in case *you* do. by walkon2003-11-07 00:39:33
                                Breaking this up.. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-07 07:57:31
    Try harder. by BloodyViking2003-11-06 08:15:26
      One point. by walkon2003-11-06 08:40:12
        Severe preeclampsia for one. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 09:48:45
          Sorry. by walkon2003-11-06 09:53:46

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)