The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
The Right Reverend Bush is at it again by Blackbyrd2 2006-11-19 12:55:59
Clicky

Now if I was going to troll properly, I'd say I was completely opposed to this action, and that third trimester abortions were ok and fine.

I can't do that. They're terrible things. But Rev. Bush hasn't allowed an out for a woman who's life is at risk. Classic ultra-conservative black/white thinking.

I can't stand that this man is our President.

[ Reply ]
  Theres no provision for by syren2003-11-06 00:23:13
    third trimester babies are viable by DragonLady2003-11-06 00:33:02
      *Nods* by syren2003-11-06 00:46:53
        with adequate health care by DragonLady2003-11-06 01:02:06
          maybe i need to move down under... by LunarRainn2003-11-06 01:27:57
            This isn't just 3rd trimester abortion by Patch2003-11-06 05:58:35
      That may well be true. by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 01:49:36
      Not ALL third trimester fetuses are viable. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:12:50
        If it's dead there is no partial birth abortion! by Patch2003-11-06 06:19:45
          You get the terminology correct. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:30:00
            There is the conflict I think.. well 2 major ones by Patch2003-11-06 06:38:36
              The ban applies across the board. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:57:39
          Thank you Patch for setting this straight (n/t) by crash_2003-11-06 06:39:27
          Not true. by tigermouse2003-11-06 07:18:57
            How is dilation and extraction by Patch2003-11-06 07:35:29
              Because the fetus is physically removed by tigermouse2003-11-06 07:45:25
      Not true. by BloodyViking2003-11-06 08:08:11
    I am NOT standing up for Bush, but . . . by merfax2003-11-06 00:41:19
      Um, what? by McNutcase2003-11-06 00:51:49
        Ain't politics fun :-/ by merfax2003-11-06 01:10:23
      Most of the top advisors to the POTUS are replaced by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 05:29:38
        new time unit? by horenberg2003-11-06 05:48:57
          Nope, a New York nanosecond is considerably by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 05:56:20
      You need to talk to my cousin Shawn.. by AshyRaine2003-11-06 06:42:54
        What secret agency? by Hlloyge2006-11-19 12:55:59
          True, not secret at all by AshyRaine2003-11-06 12:47:08
    Life vs. Health by secgeek2003-11-06 06:19:59
  Irony by horenberg2003-11-06 00:25:40
    Either you're pro-choice or you're anti-choice by Dazed2003-11-06 00:37:50
      I think Roe vs. Wade resulted in a sort by skeptic2003-11-06 00:54:21
        Thanks for sharing your thoughts by Dazed2003-11-06 01:10:59
      grey areas by horenberg2003-11-06 01:17:17
        The beauty of grey by Spisefisken2003-11-06 01:28:18
        abortion is not a form of birth control by LunarRainn2003-11-06 01:38:51
          Actually, it is. by skeptic2003-11-06 01:53:54
            maybe i have lived in berkeley too long... by LunarRainn2003-11-06 02:17:56
              Yeah, it is very sad. by skeptic2003-11-06 02:38:14
                *eep* (n/t) by LunarRainn2003-11-06 02:40:16
      Has anyone read TMB's rant on pro/anti-choice? by Control2003-11-06 01:29:31
        I'm actually a big fan of hers. by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 01:38:18
          I agree completely by Control2003-11-06 01:40:48
  Exercise your rights by Anonymous Cow2003-11-06 01:02:44
    I do, actually. by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 01:41:01
  You know what bugs me? by skeptic2003-11-06 01:32:52
    This is nothing new for Bush. by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 01:44:31
    it's not hypocritical by LunarRainn2003-11-06 02:01:40
      monarchy ain't so bad after all by horenberg2003-11-06 02:21:33
        At least by Hlloyge2003-11-06 04:54:44
    Because he is an idiot? by slayer2003-11-06 02:40:39
    No sadly because he is a Christian by crash_2003-11-06 05:46:07
      All Southerners vote Democrat? by Naruki2003-11-06 05:51:12
        Yeah, the pendulum's swinging the other way. by nin_man2003-11-06 06:13:16
          and california always voted republican (n/t) by altordwm2003-11-06 06:29:04
          I can remember not too long ago by crash_2003-11-06 06:50:04
        Atlanta is full of Yankees now by crash_2003-11-06 07:02:21
        Florida is not a southern state by crash_2003-11-06 07:04:15
      Being a Christian does not make it hypocritical by altordwm2003-11-06 06:09:08
        The hypocrisy is in the "right to life" thing. by skeptic2003-11-06 07:17:32
          But that is not what he said by altordwm2003-11-06 07:33:48
      "Rarely see a Democrat in church"? by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:24:21
        Really there are not that many in the churches by crash_2003-11-06 06:36:45
          So what you're actually saying by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:46:32
            Funny, I just saw this on the news last night by altordwm2006-11-19 12:55:59
              Well then there you go. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 07:00:35
                I can't say I disagree by altordwm2003-11-06 07:08:59
          Methinks thou hast a biased sample. by JohnClarke2003-11-06 14:42:33
    Well I do prefer that he let them live by Patch2003-11-06 06:07:53
    Oh, come on. Be serious. by walkon2003-11-06 06:45:07
      Again, if the decisions about the right to life by skeptic2003-11-06 07:36:52
        Ah. by walkon2003-11-06 08:15:47
          Hmm. Retraction. by walkon2003-11-06 08:37:45
            Take "creator of life" literally and apply it by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 09:24:16
              They didn't create "life", though. by walkon2003-11-06 09:54:51
                How do you figure? by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 10:04:44
                  Sure, they created the fetus. by walkon2003-11-06 10:46:29
                    Remove your god from the equation. by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 10:51:41
                      I thought you were talking about Bush's logic. by walkon2003-11-06 12:22:44
  He's "grandstanding" by Slamlander2003-11-06 01:46:28
    Grandstanding, and smooching posterior by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 01:53:03
      Cthulhu 4 president! by horenberg2003-11-06 02:12:18
      how do you figure he wants Roe v Wade overturned? by altordwm2003-11-06 06:02:26
        That's a nice mealy-mouthed by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:32:34
          It's also a nice way of saying by altordwm2003-11-06 06:38:09
            Just because a large percentage of the population by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 07:02:36
              But that's democracy! by nin_man2003-11-06 07:12:11
                Heh. That's what the Constitution's for. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 07:27:28
      If he wasn't sure it'd get smacked down by Slamlander2003-11-06 06:17:36
  GENOCIDE by LunarRainn2003-11-06 01:49:58
    Fire power answers Q1 by scissors2003-11-06 03:54:48
      The entire theory doesn't hold water by skeptic2003-11-06 04:29:50
  So I assume you can name by slayer2003-11-06 01:52:32
    Why would you assume that? by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 02:01:09
      I can't prove a negative. by slayer2003-11-06 02:26:50
        That is neither my responsibility by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 03:24:13
          Feh..tired..let me restate by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 03:30:22
    Hydrocephalus by tigermouse2003-11-06 07:49:31
  I don't buy the "woman's life at risk" argument by crash_2003-11-06 05:28:35
    That's not a very fair accusation. by skeptic2003-11-06 05:50:33
      I'm going to go through this thread and reply by altordwm2003-11-06 06:26:32
    Why force a woman to undergo major surgery by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:00:22
      So it can grow up and be president someday? by NOLAWitch2003-11-06 06:04:53
        Yes. Yes it could.* by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 06:09:44
        Anti-abortion != religion, fundamentalism. by walkon2003-11-06 06:53:45
          But religion, fundamentalism == anti-abortion. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 07:09:43
            Then what's the standard? by walkon2003-11-06 08:33:10
              For a number of reasons. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 09:17:38
                But... Those reasons would only convice someone by walkon2003-11-06 09:51:33
                  That's not something you're going to find. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 11:27:32
                    If that standard doesn't exist, by walkon2003-11-06 12:50:46
                      They don't have a place in the public debate by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 14:23:30
                        Are we going in circles? by walkon2003-11-06 14:53:04
                          You're doing the sidestepping. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 15:23:40
                            OK... by walkon2003-11-06 16:17:06
                              Just in case you check back.... by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 19:07:02
                                And in case *you* do. by walkon2003-11-07 00:39:33
                                Breaking this up.. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-07 07:57:31
    Try harder. by BloodyViking2003-11-06 08:15:26
      One point. by walkon2003-11-06 08:40:12
        Severe preeclampsia for one. by thewrongcrowd2003-11-06 09:48:45
          Sorry. by walkon2003-11-06 09:53:46
  For the record... by altordwm2003-11-06 05:52:29
  I don't see a single woman in any of by Slamlander2003-11-06 06:27:25
  Read the thread, now commenting... by random_c2003-11-06 06:38:29
  Some points: by kelli2172003-11-06 07:15:33
    1.) What's the passage? by walkon2003-11-06 08:45:13
      My point is more subtle. by kelli2172003-11-06 10:54:06
        My point is entirely direct. by walkon2003-11-06 12:17:25
          Okay, here's a direct answer. by kelli2172003-11-06 14:46:12
            Uh... by walkon2003-11-06 14:57:24
              Yes by kelli2172003-11-06 23:39:39
        Does Islam follow the New Testament? (n/t) by JohnClarke2003-11-06 15:46:07
  Wrong, wrong, wrong by JohnClarke2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Having reviewed *most* of the posts, by Blackbyrd22003-11-06 23:48:43

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)