|
Sorry, I know everyone hates PETA | by Egaeus | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
When exactly did the Majority decide the wear | by NavyJoe | 2003-11-03 07:50:41 |
|
I think it's more along the line | by Egaeus | 2003-11-03 07:57:28 |
|
I don't believe that is morally wrong at all. | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 08:08:37 |
|
Hence | by Egaeus | 2003-11-03 08:14:29 |
|
You were there? | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 08:19:44 |
|
A Straw Man argument is the best you can do? | by Egaeus | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
The funniest part is that his counterclaim | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 08:55:04 |
|
Heheh... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 09:10:59 |
|
Few people actually do. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 09:25:56 |
|
The only implicit statement made... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 09:46:01 |
| Let me explain your folly... |
by Naruki |
2003-11-03 10:06:11 |
You are _now_ claiming that you merely pointed out that the assertion was unproveable.
That sounds all well and good, but let's think for a minute, shall we?
Why would you point out something like that?
If you wished to make the opposite assertion, it would be a meaningful statement, hopefully followed with your evidence or at least reasoning behind your belief. But you claim that you are being "neutral", so strike that motive.
Another case where it would be worth mentioning is if the poster had made some serious breach of logic that needed to be corrected, as you did when you used the word "de-evolution" as though it was a meaningful concept. Since the poster repeated accepted scientific theory, that clearly isn't the reason you made your comment.
We are left with only one possible explanation for your statement: you are apparently vying for the job of Captain Obvious.
Sadly, you failed to realize that you must also point out everything else that's obvious if you wish to get the job. Such as "we don't _know_ that there is no air in outer space, since no astronaut ever took off his helmet to test it" and "we don't _know_ that crap tastes bad, except for that one kid who tested it, but who wants to trust the word of a crap eater?"
Or you could just be a logically impaired buffoon, but I prefer not to jump to such conclusions easily. And you're definitely making it too easy. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Allow me to explain yours... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:21:06 |
|
Nah, that's regular trolling. | by LionsPhil | 2003-11-03 10:25:36 |
|
Only if I don't have to upgrade | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 10:31:13 |
|
Good one... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:31:34 |
|
I've always assumed that Naruki just figures... | by Ravenlock | 2003-11-03 10:25:48 |
|
That's it in a nutshell. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:29:20 |
|
How'd you fit Cousin It in a nutshell? (n/t) | by tnglives | 2003-11-03 12:05:26 |
|
Shave him and there's practically nothing there. ( (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2003-11-03 12:11:08 |
|
You won't believe what *is* there, though. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 12:20:36 |
|
But why would he jump... <MODERATED> | by YakkoWarner | 2003-11-03 12:29:20 |
|
We are sooo impressed | by BloodyViking | 2003-11-03 10:40:49 |
|
I know... I know... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:46:59 |
|
Alas, poor fun, | by LionsPhil | 2003-11-03 10:55:53 |
|
*Glug* *Glug* | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 11:03:12 |
|
Now let me get this straight... | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:44:12 |
|
LOL! | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:35:20 |
