|
Sorry, I know everyone hates PETA | by Egaeus | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
When exactly did the Majority decide the wear | by NavyJoe | 2003-11-03 07:50:41 |
|
I think it's more along the line | by Egaeus | 2003-11-03 07:57:28 |
|
I don't believe that is morally wrong at all. | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 08:08:37 |
|
Hence | by Egaeus | 2003-11-03 08:14:29 |
|
You were there? | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 08:19:44 |
|
A Straw Man argument is the best you can do? | by Egaeus | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
The funniest part is that his counterclaim | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 08:55:04 |
| Heheh... |
by nelzie |
2003-11-03 09:10:59 |
I never claimed to be right...
I reread my statement, it makes no claim of right or wrong. You are making your own claims. I was merely taking the neutral ground.
Now, if I emphatically declared him to be wrong and that there was no way that they did use all of an animal because we aren't able to see it, yeah, then my response could match what you assume it matches...
Again, I offered no proof. I simply said there is no way to know for sure. Our ancient ancestors could have killed certain animals soley for their skin, after finding that the meat tasted poorly, which were then later consumed by scavenger creatures. Other animals could have been killed soley for meat, if our ancestors found the skins to be rather weak/ill-suited to the tasks they needed animal skin for. I don't know, I doubt that anyone on this planet really knows for certain. People do have a good number of strong beliefs on the subject though.
Thanks for playing!
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Few people actually do. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 09:25:56 |
|
The only implicit statement made... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 09:46:01 |
|
Let me explain your folly... | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 10:06:11 |
|
Allow me to explain yours... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:21:06 |
|
Nah, that's regular trolling. | by LionsPhil | 2003-11-03 10:25:36 |
|
Only if I don't have to upgrade | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 10:31:13 |
|
Good one... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:31:34 |
|
I've always assumed that Naruki just figures... | by Ravenlock | 2003-11-03 10:25:48 |
|
That's it in a nutshell. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:29:20 |
|
How'd you fit Cousin It in a nutshell? (n/t) | by tnglives | 2003-11-03 12:05:26 |
|
Shave him and there's practically nothing there. ( (n/t) | by Ravenlock | 2003-11-03 12:11:08 |
|
You won't believe what *is* there, though. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 12:20:36 |
|
But why would he jump... <MODERATED> | by YakkoWarner | 2003-11-03 12:29:20 |
|
We are sooo impressed | by BloodyViking | 2003-11-03 10:40:49 |
|
I know... I know... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:46:59 |
|
Alas, poor fun, | by LionsPhil | 2003-11-03 10:55:53 |
|
*Glug* *Glug* | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 11:03:12 |
|
Now let me get this straight... | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:44:12 |
|
LOL! | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 11:35:20 |
|
I know this is hopeless | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 09:36:14 |
|
I disagree. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 09:39:52 |
|
Would we need a control group? | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 09:45:38 |
|
Well... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 09:57:01 |
|
thewrongcrowd was right. | by Naruki | 2003-11-03 10:08:38 |
|
But entertaining | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 10:16:46 |
|
Yeah, check out my reply above... | by nelzie | 2003-11-03 10:23:11 |
|
*shrug* If you say so. (n/t) | by thewrongcrowd | 2003-11-03 10:33:53 |
