The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Digital Logic question: by MrTrick2003-11-01 21:13:18
  I've read this several dozen times by Egaeus2003-11-01 21:21:16
    oops, my bad. by MrTrick 2003-11-01 21:33:40
Basically, I have a device (electronic LED banner) from Tandy opened up and ready to be dissected.

My assignment is to replace the keyboard system with circuitry, and have the circuitry communicate with a computer through a serial cable.

The keyboard is a simple touch-switch type, with a rubber overlay. The wires leading in and out were described before, and I've started experimenting with different combinations.

Each 4 control line can connect to 1 of 16 data lines. Touch a control line and a data line whilst the device is in "input" mode, and a letter will appear on the screen. The problem is that the logic levels for the keyboard are too low (for less power usage I suppose) to use CMOS or TTL voltages.

Ideally, I'd have 64 transistors - 1 connected to each valid permutation of a combination (C&E), and connect the 64 bases to a big demux. Now I'm told that you can't simulate a single transistor in a CPLD, only logic levels. Is there any logic component that either provides a short or open circuit across two pins, depending on the logic level of a third?

I don't know if that's any clearer.
[ Reply ]
      Much better by Egaeus2003-11-01 21:44:36
        I don't *have* 64 transistors by MrTrick2003-11-01 21:48:11
          What kind of logic levels are you looking for? by Egaeus2003-11-01 22:17:20

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)