which he has, then he should not have a say in her future and the choice should be her families'.
Again, if it wasn't for the fact that Michael has a lot of money to gain from her dying, it would be a little easier to deal with. But we have no way of knowing if Terry did wish to die since she didn't leave a living will and since the husband has a huge conflict of interest here. It doesn't seem right that he can make the decision. Again, the case didn't start as a fish for political gain (though I am sure some politician is going to take advantage of it, everyone else is now). I would support the removal of life support if it wasn't for the conflict of interest. I think if you ask a lot of Floridians, they will tell you the same thing. |
