| ...but that doesn't mean that every issue that touches them automatically becomes a privacy issue. Specifically in this California situation, the abuse had nothing to do with privacy issues. Corruption, sure, clearly. And class. But the approval of using the cameras at all, which is a privacy issue, is a separate issue from its implementation, which is where the corruption came in in this case, and not in a way that negatively impacted anyone's privacy, from your description, any more than was intended and permitted by the spirit of the law approving the cameras. |
