| The FHM issue, from the top. |
by Illiad |
2003-07-11 16:14:41 |
| "From the top," as in the final word from yours truly.
I know there are some of you that dislike seeing the FHM banner on the site for whatever personal reasons. Based on the amount of feedback on the issue, those who truly object to it can be counted on the fingers of one hand.
Given that I'm serving this cartoon to well over a million readers, you'll understand when I say that your voices, though heard, carry very little weight.
Therefore, the FHM campaign will run until I decide otherwise. End of story. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Ok. (n/t) | by Llyr | 2003-07-11 16:15:14 |
|
Bravo!!!!! | by rdarsey | 2003-07-11 16:17:18 |
|
uhm... ok. | by dire_lobo | 2003-07-11 16:24:51 |
|
You've not heard ME at full volume! :+) | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 16:27:03 |
|
OK, Super-Quibbler... | by ChuckAB | 2003-07-11 16:29:30 |
|
Well... | by rdarsey | 2003-07-11 16:33:25 |
|
Enough to cause ear damage. Tinnitis in some, | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 16:35:22 |
|
Yes, that quality is both useful and annoying. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-07-11 16:37:04 |
|
VERY annoying in a call center. | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 16:42:22 |
|
Creating Vacuum | by etwas_egal | 2003-07-11 17:09:47 |
|
If we're going to be picky, | by LionsPhil | 2003-07-11 16:31:06 |
|
whooo-chee-ka-bey-stas! | by dire_lobo | 2003-07-11 16:39:18 |
|
It's spreading. | by LionsPhil | 2003-07-11 16:41:43 |
|
Ok, so that means | by CrazySteve | 2003-07-11 16:29:35 |
|
Not at links, no. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 16:30:33 |
|
Well that makes absolutely no sense. <nt> | by CrazySteve | 2003-07-11 16:32:47 |
|
And the world has to make sense since....? (n/t) | by taIon | 2003-07-11 16:34:07 |
|
Sorry :) Not *AS* links *grin* (n/t) | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 16:39:24 |
|
I think | by Didactylos | 2003-07-11 16:33:23 |
|
Like making UF money. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-07-11 16:35:19 |
|
Real simple | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 16:37:18 |
|
Erm... | by Llyr | 2003-07-11 16:41:49 |
|
Spencer... | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 16:43:25 |
|
*sigh* | by Llyr | 2003-07-11 16:46:55 |
|
How? | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 16:57:22 |
|
Apples & Apples | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 17:42:49 |
|
Nope... | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 18:10:05 |
|
Define "out of control", please? (n/t) | by Llyr | 2003-07-11 18:11:32 |
|
That's what I'd like to know. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 18:14:40 |
|
I'm not saying that the ad picture | by Llyr | 2003-07-11 18:16:13 |
|
How about the ruling... | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 18:18:09 |
|
There is no rule set in stone... | by Stavros | 2003-07-11 18:24:35 |
|
Right. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 18:50:04 |
|
The problem is "anal retentive" is NOT a | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 19:04:28 |
|
The people who think it is an insult... | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 20:24:45 |
|
Which brings the question... | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 21:09:36 |
|
And thus... | by Didactylos | 2003-07-11 18:26:36 |
|
There is one...Name Change ;> | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 18:30:37 |
|
That's the point | by Didactylos | 2003-07-11 18:51:19 |
|
Actually... | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 20:05:57 |
|
Out of control = | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 18:21:10 |
|
And there you have it, ladies and gents! | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 18:42:40 |
|
I seem to recall one... | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 19:06:31 |
|
Which means... | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 18:16:30 |
|
Double application of single standard | by etwas_egal | 2003-07-11 17:26:19 |
|
Woohoo! Someone who has taken Philosophy 310! | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 17:30:55 |
|
Nope. | by Kickstart | 2003-07-11 16:57:58 |
|
Not at all similar. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 17:40:08 |
|
Read Illiad re: post persistence vs lack of ad | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 18:36:04 |
|
I think I've covered this elsewhere. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 20:23:19 |
|
It does indeed. | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 21:29:15 |
|
I don't think it's sinkin' in. | by geminidomino2 | 2003-07-11 22:01:10 |
|
Can YOU post banner ads for all to see on UF? | by geminidomino2 | 2003-07-11 18:38:17 |
|
You seem to be confused about something. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 20:22:21 |
|
The only problem is your ranting. | by geminidomino2 | 2003-07-11 21:50:00 |
|
What worries me | by Didactylos | 2003-07-11 16:29:41 |
|
I'm guessing the IP addresses were similar. | by LionsPhil | 2003-07-11 16:33:58 |
|
All comes down to IP addresses | by Kickstart | 2003-07-11 16:34:13 |
|
Question: | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 16:43:45 |
|
Daily? | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 16:45:45 |
|
do proxieshelp or hinder? | by defdood | 2003-07-11 17:03:01 |
|
Yeppers | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 17:08:53 |
|
is this your entire day job? | by defdood | 2003-07-11 19:19:02 |
|
Kind of... | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 21:59:44 |
|
I agree with that, but there's an issue that needs | by Stavros | 2003-07-11 17:16:34 |
|
Silly or not, that's how it is. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 17:20:15 |
|
Good question... | by Illiad | 2003-07-11 17:24:48 |
|
Yes, I see your point there. | by Stavros | 2003-07-11 17:45:39 |
|
Hmm...good point... | by DeadEyez | 2003-07-11 18:22:21 |
|
Yes, like going back 16 days... | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 18:39:05 |
