The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Attn: Concerned Citizens of the US by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 11:05:12
  This is open to everyone, despite the title. by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 11:06:13
    Won't happen under these people. by adiplomat2003-07-11 11:09:46
      That's why I'm going to vote Dem next election. by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 11:11:24
        See. *THATS* why US politics is screwed up. by subbywan2003-07-11 11:27:15
          I suggest you actually read TMBI's post by adiplomat2003-07-11 11:30:19
            But then that's not democracy. by subbywan2003-07-11 11:37:22
              Newsflash! America Not A Democracy. by Naruki2003-07-11 11:38:53
                We're not a direct democracy by subbywan2003-07-11 11:48:05
                  We have every right to complain, through our votes by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 11:55:31
                    Even at the expense of the country? by subbywan2003-07-11 11:59:32
                      Yes, even at the expense of the country. by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 12:03:39
                        Much like communism, that only works on paper. by subbywan2003-07-11 12:09:37
                          Not at all. by TheyMustBIdiots2003-07-11 12:15:33
                            That would be wonderful it it worked like that. by subbywan 2003-07-11 12:26:01
Hell, they couldn't even say "nigger" when *quoting* text in the OJ case. It's always "the n-word". While I don't have a problem with them using "the n-word", when you're reading a legal brief and you're so worried about offending someone that you can't even quote it verbatim, it's pathetic.

As for Freedom of Speech, try writing a letter to the President and tell him you'd like to whip his ass for what he's done in Iraq. (actually, you can try this with any president, not just Bush). See just how far a claim of "Freedom of Speech" gets you then.
[ Reply ]
                              Okay, but that's not freedom of speech by sparkyr2003-07-11 13:53:03
                                But you're having to restrict your speech. by subbywan2003-07-11 14:02:43
                                You got that backwards. by Naruki2003-07-11 14:49:53
                                Ben Stein probably wouldn't threaten if he were by subbywan2003-07-11 15:04:49
                                It SHOULD be, yes. by LurkerMo2003-07-11 14:05:29
                                That's like saying those who support by subbywan2003-07-11 14:17:27
                                Take another look. This technique that you by LurkerMo2003-07-11 14:53:10
                                Do you support an adulterer? by subbywan2003-07-11 15:08:33
                              You could probably get away with that by Naruki2003-07-11 14:48:44
                                Clinton has nothing to say about it. by subbywan2003-07-11 14:52:00

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)