|
Attn: Concerned Citizens of the US | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 11:05:12 |
|
This is open to everyone, despite the title. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 11:06:13 |
|
Won't happen under these people. | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 11:09:46 |
|
That's why I'm going to vote Dem next election. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 11:11:24 |
|
See. *THATS* why US politics is screwed up. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 11:27:15 |
|
I suggest you actually read TMBI's post | by adiplomat | 2003-07-11 11:30:19 |
|
But then that's not democracy. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 11:37:22 |
|
Newsflash! America Not A Democracy. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 11:38:53 |
|
We're not a direct democracy | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 11:48:05 |
|
We have every right to complain, through our votes | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 11:55:31 |
|
Even at the expense of the country? | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 11:59:32 |
| Yes, even at the expense of the country. |
by TheyMustBIdiots |
2003-07-11 12:03:39 |
As Benjamin Franklin once said. "He who gives up his freedoms for security will soon have neither". I happen to agree with Mr. Franklin.
I see the fact that some people who have committed crimes go free as a small price to pay to avoid a complete totalitarian society, which is what will happen if you start to destroy individual rights. You don't need to get ridiuculous about it, it just needs to be the number one priority.
Isn't the nation comprised of individuals? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Much like communism, that only works on paper. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 12:09:37 |
|
Hoss puckey. | by sparkyr | 2003-07-11 12:15:14 |
|
As I said. It works on paper. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 12:21:10 |
|
Then | by mirage | 2003-07-11 12:27:13 |
|
Oh, wait I forgot, we can't | by sparkyr | 2003-07-11 12:40:02 |
|
Nah. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 12:47:41 |
|
No Child Left Behind | by saxguy | 2003-07-11 13:15:22 |
|
What exactly IS the function of the school system? | by LurkerMo | 2003-07-11 13:31:55 |
|
Unfort, Parents are more and more demanding | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 13:48:29 |
|
What would it take for parents to meet their | by LurkerMo | 2003-07-11 13:59:28 |
|
You want honest or nice? *grin* | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 14:06:07 |
|
Unfortunately, as beneficial to Society as it | by LurkerMo | 2003-07-11 14:56:30 |
|
Yep. And therein lies the problem. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 15:01:59 |
|
Am actively working on that. (n/t) | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 12:40:54 |
|
Not at all. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-07-11 12:15:33 |
|
That would be wonderful it it worked like that. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 12:26:01 |
|
Okay, but that's not freedom of speech | by sparkyr | 2003-07-11 13:53:03 |
|
But you're having to restrict your speech. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 14:02:43 |
|
You got that backwards. | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 14:49:53 |
|
Ben Stein probably wouldn't threaten if he were | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 15:04:49 |
|
It SHOULD be, yes. | by LurkerMo | 2003-07-11 14:05:29 |
|
That's like saying those who support | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 14:17:27 |
|
Take another look. This technique that you | by LurkerMo | 2003-07-11 14:53:10 |
|
Do you support an adulterer? | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 15:08:33 |
|
You could probably get away with that | by Naruki | 2003-07-11 14:48:44 |
|
Clinton has nothing to say about it. | by subbywan | 2003-07-11 14:52:00 |