The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

This does not look good: by webishop2003-07-11 08:16:53
  where do you see Bush saying that? by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 09:40:01
    That's the basis the administration used to by NOLAWitch2003-07-11 10:07:24
      on what basis do you make such a claim by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:18:54
        Sorry, but your argument is pathetic. by Naruki2003-07-11 10:26:35
          it wasn't a UN requirement it was a US requirement by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:36:00
            So its okay by MikeCDN2003-07-11 10:38:00
              Was that an unreasonable demand? by BloodyViking2003-07-11 11:21:41
                The USA can not by MikeCDN2003-07-11 11:38:19
                  Are you claiming by BloodyViking 2003-07-11 11:43:51
that the UN didn't want Saddam to uphold his side of the cease-fire agreements? If not, then the _demand_ was Not acting against UN wishes.

We will never know for sure whether the war was against UN wishes, because the promised French veto kept the possibility from even coming to a vote.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)