The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
This does not look good: by webishop2003-07-11 08:16:53
  where do you see Bush saying that? by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 09:40:01
    The original reasons were? by MikeCDN2003-07-11 09:46:01
      Never the less by DesertRat662003-07-11 10:00:54
        Irrelevent by MikeCDN2003-07-11 10:06:53
          It is entirely too early to say there are no WMD's by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:10:53
            How much time is sufficient, in your opinion? by NOLAWitch2003-07-11 10:18:53
              That is quite difficult to specify for a layman by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:26:20
                Then watch your mouth, apologist. by Naruki2003-07-11 10:28:29
                  No, he implies that the reasons we went to war are by quilting_kitty2003-07-11 10:33:29
                    Exactly!!!! (someone understands me!!) n/t by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:38:54
                      I'll grant you that there might have been plenty by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 10:46:08
                        agreed however..... by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:50:23
                          How often do you have to be told this: by LurkerMo 2003-07-11 11:34:24
If you say that we don't know whether there are WMD, then how could we go to war BECAUSE WE KNEW THERE WERE WMD? You can't have it both ways, you know.

Face it, the president lied to get the support to start a war. When the war was won, his popularity rose high enough that nobody is willing to call him on it.

Of course, we only have his word for it that the war was won. US military personnel are dying every week. The peace is not won.

But then, who wants peace, right?
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)