The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

This does not look good: by webishop2003-07-11 08:16:53
  where do you see Bush saying that? by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 09:40:01
    The original reasons were? by MikeCDN2003-07-11 09:46:01
      Never the less by DesertRat662003-07-11 10:00:54
        Irrelevent by MikeCDN2003-07-11 10:06:53
          It is entirely too early to say there are no WMD's by zaphod_bee4 2003-07-11 10:10:53
they quite simply haven't been searching long enough yet to find out what happened to them. They may still be there, they may be moved to a different country, they may have been destroyed mere days before the troops arrived.

That kind of judgement will have to wait for more information. Any accusation made now risks being untrue.
[ Reply ]
            Its been how long now? by MikeCDN2003-07-11 10:18:09
            Then YOU stop claiming they exist! by Naruki2003-07-11 10:18:10
              They did exist by BloodyViking2003-07-11 10:55:22
                And we can prove it. The US provided them. (n/t) by LurkerMo2003-07-11 11:36:40
            How much time is sufficient, in your opinion? by NOLAWitch2003-07-11 10:18:53
              That is quite difficult to specify for a layman by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:26:20
                Oh and it is also too soon to say they do exist by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:27:52
                Then watch your mouth, apologist. by Naruki2003-07-11 10:28:29
                  I hereby retract......... by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:32:39
                  No, he implies that the reasons we went to war are by quilting_kitty2003-07-11 10:33:29
                    Exactly!!!! (someone understands me!!) n/t by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:38:54
                      I'll grant you that there might have been plenty by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 10:46:08
                        For THAT matter... what kind of Clear and Present by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 10:48:31
                          That's why people were supportive. by NOLAWitch2003-07-11 10:53:09
                            I always thought that Bush just wanted to by WebDiva2003-07-11 10:59:19
                              That is what got him public opinion. by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 11:01:08
                              He's got a short attention span and no cojones. by NOLAWitch2003-07-11 11:02:44
                                I disagree somewhat by WebDiva2003-07-11 11:10:36
                            But what most people are missing is that by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 10:59:49
                        agreed however..... by zaphod_bee42003-07-11 10:50:23
                          I most vehemently disagree... not with you but by BuggedEyes2003-07-11 10:56:43
                          No it isn't. by BloodyViking2003-07-11 10:59:33
                          How often do you have to be told this: by LurkerMo2003-07-11 11:34:24
            500 years by mirage2003-07-11 11:11:43
              Too much. by BloodyViking2003-07-11 12:21:10
                Buying by mirage2003-07-11 12:32:58
                  With the kind of money Saddam had by BloodyViking2003-07-11 14:04:26
                    Really? So why didn't he? by Naruki2003-07-11 14:54:00
                      Perhaps he wasn't as psycho by BloodyViking2003-07-11 15:05:20

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)