| Richard Stallman is a whacko! |
by Slamlander |
2003-06-07 09:19:24 |
| Discuss. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Dick who? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:22:56 |
|
*posts 'DO NOT FEED TROLL' sign* (n/t) | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:24:10 |
|
*LARTs impudent whelp* | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:25:01 |
|
to Linux/GNU geeks you would be. | by Ubergeek2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You are amazingly incorrect. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:31:04 |
|
I am not a Linux/GNU geek for one. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:34:40 |
|
The second post, no. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:39:23 |
|
I'm not asking for an apology for you. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:43:40 |
|
from you* need to use the preview buttton. (n/t) | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:46:45 |
|
That's an excellent book. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:50:31 |
|
I enjoyed it. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:52:38 |
|
RMS == Mister Open Source, roughly. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 09:29:45 |
|
Why'd you think that? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:33:32 |
|
Well, I probably would Google first. | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Well, I like him already. ;-) | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:51:46 |
|
and he can dance. (n/t) | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:53:59 |
|
Yeah, but I do mean ferverently. | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You kidding? That's funny! | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:02:18 |
|
What's up with that? KS, please delete ^that | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 09:26:56 |
|
I've already sent him a book on Stallman. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:27:58 |
|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2003-06-07 09:29:38 |
|
Uh...dude. 10, 9, 8... | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 09:30:34 |
|
not a joke ... dead serious! | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 09:42:19 |
|
Chill out. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:31:57 |
|
He kilt a subject that needs discussing | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 09:39:14 |
|
I don't think so actually | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 09:49:53 |
|
Right. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 09:50:40 |
|
Moderated for non-FYOS safe language (n/t) | by Nea | 2003-06-07 09:56:51 |
|
umm no offense | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 09:38:29 |
|
Ahem! | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 09:40:30 |
|
sorry Naruki, and that other unknown party. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:45:19 |
|
Unwarranted suppression of subject | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 09:47:35 |
|
see my comment farther down | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 09:52:06 |
|
What we have here is three people... | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:03:57 |
|
lol | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 10:08:49 |
|
Well, I tend to dislike the too-easy | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:42:14 |
|
Both. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:44:22 |
|
Jerk. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:08:14 |
|
Good point. | by rapido75 | 2003-06-07 11:15:07 |
|
It seems I misspoke. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:18:27 |
|
I will get the Last Word! | by rapido75 | 2003-06-07 11:28:02 |
|
No, I! I shall be the last! | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:30:03 |
|
"Supression"? | by rapido75 | 2003-06-07 11:11:45 |
|
"I was at a Linux/GNU convention, and I saw a man | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 09:23:18 |
|
I'd need to read more of his thoughts | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 09:58:10 |
|
Alot of his ideas are just that.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:02:17 |
|
I've skimmed over a chapter. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:11:50 |
|
Talks about it in the book actually.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:16:42 |
|
Oh, right. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:24:01 |
|
totally, communism would be great.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:29:03 |
|
no, literally. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:29:45 |
|
*gives Ubergeek 2... | by EvilLionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:33:45 |
|
Those make outstanding frisbees... | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:34:31 |
|
how'd you know i had a collection? | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:36:03 |
|
That's more or less what it boils down to. ;) (n/t | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:33:49 |
|
Communism would not be great, | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:33:01 |
|
Yes. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:36:48 |
|
Exactly. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:38:12 |
|
Yep. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:40:21 |
|
Also you have the ruler.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:42:45 |
|
You COULD have a communist democracy. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:44:52 |
|
That's why I don't call it a democracy :P | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:46:34 |
|
i have possibly wrongfully so.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:49:51 |
|
Democracy is just as bad, if not worse | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:57:19 |
|
Not so sure | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 10:51:08 |
|
No, I'm not knee-jerking. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:03:17 |
|
Agreed on both of your points. | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 14:41:47 |
|
Question: | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:07:43 |
|
Why wouldn't the car be community property? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:09:37 |
|
Shining may not be the best word for Enron | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:15:50 |
|
No, greed is always bad. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:19:56 |
|
See here | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Been there, seen that. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:24:55 |
|
It would appear so ;=) (n/t) | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:26:50 |
|
Oh, BTW | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
It seems. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:24:27 |
|
Problem: | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 15:01:32 |
|
There's a difference between greed | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 15:17:15 |
|
You're right of course | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 16:25:47 |
|
No, that's non-ideal communism. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:45:20 |
|
we want manhatton, here's some beads. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:47:50 |
|
*LOL* (n/t) | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:48:50 |
|
Why would _no_ property rights be great? | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:48:26 |
|
Besides, if everyone were equal, | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 10:52:23 |
|
equal != identical (n/t) | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 10:58:56 |
|
From dictionary.com | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:12:43 |
|
Invalid argument. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:17:03 |
|
You never said equal under the law | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:19:07 |
|
The Borg aren't "equal", either. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:21:15 |
|
haven't heard that term in a while. (n/t) | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 11:22:43 |
|
*You're* telling someone | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:23:04 |
|
Heehee. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:24:50 |
|
Thank you. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:26:25 |
|
Point conceded. (n/t) | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:31:10 |
|
I think Naruki said it all (thanks!) (n/t) | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 15:16:00 |
|
Please reread your own post for your mistake. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:05:44 |
|
You're right, in context, that doesn't work. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:10:11 |
|
Why does the government fade away? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:14:06 |
|
I thought that was somewhere in the Manifesto | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:26:05 |
|
I can't speak for the manifeso. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:28:18 |
|
It's a worthwhile read, if only to get an idea | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:30:46 |
|
I always had the idea that the last century | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:35:38 |
|
The hearsay is correct. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:37:27 |
|
*gasp* You mean Russia is ruled by... | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:40:28 |
|
Or her cousin ;) (n/t) | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:45:52 |
|
Like the many cells | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:32:15 |
|
You're right on that | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 15:29:58 |
|
Wouldn't dealing with them | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:20:16 |
|
No, it would not mean that at all. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:23:42 |
|
Right, so people get designated property. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:27:15 |
|
But "at whim" would not be ideal communism. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:31:27 |
|
Hmm...Deus Ex's Helios ending, anyone? ;) | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:34:24 |
|
Well, I would posit that *ideal* capitalism | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:36:02 |
|
No it doesn't. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:39:31 |
|
Ah, here's the rub | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:44:30 |
|
No rub there. A gold mine is a source of | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:48:08 |
|
The capital is only there because someone | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:50:57 |
|
Your time and effort is what gets paid. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:52:01 |
|
And who says that | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 16:19:04 |
|
Communism sees things as a zero-sum | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-08 05:38:47 |
|
Not really. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:40:50 |
|
And I posit that *ideal* capitalism | by julius.apweiler | 2003-06-07 16:12:11 |
|
They're the same... | by rapido75 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
I know - I heard it. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:22:28 |
|
Geez that sucked! | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 12:00:18 |
|
Now THAT is some scary stuff.... (n/t) | by bytemedammit | 2003-06-07 16:01:18 |
|
Now that I've seen a little bit more about him... | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:07:29 |
|
he can be at times. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:08:20 |
|
oh yea. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:09:08 |
|
in fact.. | by Ubergeek2 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Heh heh heh =) | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:15:30 |
|
heheh when i ever get around to | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:18:44 |
|
I'd like to moon for rebuttal. (n/t) | by krupa | 2003-06-07 10:11:49 |
|
hahahaha! | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 10:15:48 |
|
I only know his name... | by krupa | 2003-06-07 10:25:44 |
|
Exactly. | by LionsPhil | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
there seems to be some trend on them lately | by Celticess | 2003-06-07 10:37:20 |
|
Well, this kind of ultra-modern threadstarter | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:43:05 |
|
that's different than this thread. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:45:34 |
|
Exactly. That was sort of my point. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:57:13 |
|
i ws just elaborating the point to the outside | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 11:02:21 |
|
You suck. Discuss. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 10:39:33 |
|
Pineapples. | by Ubergeek2 | 2003-06-07 10:41:51 |
|
Well, there are two things I dislike about it. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 10:56:43 |
|
You have two good choices... | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:03:53 |
|
FYOS? (n/t) | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:29:01 |
|
Nope. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:32:01 |
|
Hmm. | by TheyMustBIdiots | 2003-06-07 11:32:25 |
|
That's interesting. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:37:27 |
|
She's the one who told me. | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:41:20 |
|
True. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:35:14 |
|
I see a bad moon arising. | by kahuana | 2003-06-07 10:46:46 |
|
I have a cute and fragrant tushy, thank you... | by krupa | 2003-06-07 10:49:15 |
|
In the begining, there was no Computer Science | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:05:01 |
|
How? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:10:37 |
|
To some extent, he did, not as much as he claims. | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:15:26 |
|
Ah. If that's the case... | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:29:08 |
|
He lives on research grants. | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:32:57 |
|
These research grants are like payment for work? | by Naruki | 2003-06-07 11:37:21 |
|
He teache too, I think. | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:45:30 |
|
Yes. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-07 11:45:58 |
|
I heard a lecture he gave | by tigermouse | 2003-06-07 14:55:14 |
|
I don't think that's possible at this point... | by krupa | 2003-06-07 11:15:13 |
|
Not the tech. Rather, the business. | by Slamlander | 2003-06-07 11:35:38 |
|
Stallman's position is extreme - yes. | by kahuana | 2003-06-07 11:21:58 |