The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Woohoo! WMDs! by Kickstart2006-11-19 12:55:59
  There goes our main excuse for the war. (n/t) by micahrosenwolfe2003-06-06 12:26:27
    The oil is gone? by Naruki2003-06-06 12:36:36
      He said "excuse", not reason. ;-) (n/t) by BloodyViking2003-06-06 12:43:08
        Whew! I was worried for a second... by Naruki2003-06-06 12:45:34
          Now THAT's anthropomorphization. by LionsPhil2003-06-06 12:53:11
            Finally! by Naruki2003-06-06 12:59:59
              Whatever, 'ruki. by LionsPhil2003-06-06 13:02:47
                That's cause your complex, abstract by Naruki2003-06-06 13:17:34
                  What about this? by subbywan2006-11-19 12:55:59
                    What about it? by Naruki2003-06-06 13:27:09
                      It shows that non-humans are self-aware by subbywan2003-06-06 13:32:36
                        How does a study of chimpanzees show by LurkerMo2003-06-06 13:39:46
                          Proof of concept. by subbywan2003-06-06 13:46:29
                            Well, we certainly have one study that shows by LurkerMo2003-06-06 13:54:05
                              Agreed. It shows that according to our measurement by subbywan2003-06-06 14:01:22
                                Why do you keep doing that? by Naruki2003-06-06 14:22:37
                                Because I'm referencing more than 1 concept. by subbywan2003-06-06 14:38:42
                                I didn't read that into it. You wrote that into it by Naruki2003-06-06 14:46:04
                                That's because the referencing article by subbywan2003-06-06 14:52:16
                                According to the authors of that book by BloodyViking2003-06-06 14:59:28
                                Maybe they weren't right. Maybe they were. by subbywan 2003-06-06 15:01:50
The evidence they have shows that they were, albeit not to a point that's beyond proof.

However, applying the same test to humans should produce the same results. Does that mean the authors could be wrong there too?
[ Reply ]
                                The evidence given here, by BloodyViking2003-06-06 15:08:15
                                Yes, but I'm not trying to prove it by subbywan2003-06-06 15:13:14
                                Of COURSE there is doubt! by Naruki2003-06-06 16:47:31
                                So you were wrong then by subbywan2003-06-06 17:02:42
                                Ook! by Naruki2003-06-06 17:28:16

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)