|
Woohoo! WMDs! | by Kickstart | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
There goes our main excuse for the war. (n/t) | by micahrosenwolfe | 2003-06-06 12:26:27 |
|
The oil is gone? | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 12:36:36 |
|
He said "excuse", not reason. ;-) (n/t) | by BloodyViking | 2003-06-06 12:43:08 |
|
Whew! I was worried for a second... | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 12:45:34 |
|
Now THAT's anthropomorphization. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-06 12:53:11 |
|
Finally! | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 12:59:59 |
|
Whatever, 'ruki. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-06 13:02:47 |
|
That's cause your complex, abstract | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 13:17:34 |
|
What about this? | by subbywan | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
What about it? | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 13:27:09 |
|
It shows that non-humans are self-aware | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 13:32:36 |
|
How does a study of chimpanzees show | by LurkerMo | 2003-06-06 13:39:46 |
|
Proof of concept. | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 13:46:29 |
| Well, we certainly have one study that shows |
by LurkerMo |
2003-06-06 13:54:05 |
that chimpanzees seem to be self-aware.
Personally, I assume that my dogs have emotions, and act accordingly in all my dealings with them. I don't take that as proof that they DO have them, it is just a working hypothesis that gets me the results I want.
And the warm, fuzzy feeling that I believe they are happy:-) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Agreed. It shows that according to our measurement | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 14:01:22 |
|
That doesn't mean that they're right though. | by LionsPhil | 2003-06-06 14:03:23 |
|
Agreed | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 14:08:57 |
|
One after another. | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 16:48:33 |
|
Are you purposefully being idiotic? | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 17:00:26 |
|
Hey, subby... Ook. | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 17:03:46 |
|
So I was right. | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 17:06:57 |
|
Ook, moron. Ook ook. | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 17:28:57 |
|
Why do you keep doing that? | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 14:22:37 |
|
Because I'm referencing more than 1 concept. | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 14:38:42 |
|
I didn't read that into it. You wrote that into it | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 14:46:04 |
|
That's because the referencing article | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 14:52:16 |
|
According to the authors of that book | by BloodyViking | 2003-06-06 14:59:28 |
|
Maybe they weren't right. Maybe they were. | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 15:01:50 |
|
The evidence given here, | by BloodyViking | 2003-06-06 15:08:15 |
|
Yes, but I'm not trying to prove it | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 15:13:14 |
|
Of COURSE there is doubt! | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 16:47:31 |
|
So you were wrong then | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 17:02:42 |
|
Ook! | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 17:28:16 |
|
But you can be self-aware | by BloodyViking | 2003-06-06 14:53:52 |
|
Yes you can. We have humans who prove that. | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 15:04:05 |
|
Can you support that insult? | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 16:45:04 |
|
Seen Jerry Springer recently? | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 17:05:58 |
|
Jerry Springer guest lie to everyone often. | by Naruki | 2003-06-06 17:27:46 |
|
And *this* is the "famous Naruki", | by subbywan | 2003-06-06 17:33:16 |
