questions, and asked most of those it did in leading ways.
On the "simplistic" side, drug laws.
My position is to repeal them for anyone over 18. BUT there's a LOT more! First off, death for selling with knowledge to minors. If it can be proven you knew, you die.
Second, no drug-related healthcare unless you pay FULL price yourself. No insurance, no government help. Exception to be made for those trying to quit an addiction THE FIRST TIME. The rest of us should NOT pay for an addict's fun. Drugs should be heavily taxed, the funds earmarked for those few people that society CAN help.
Does that sound "Liberal" to you? I thought not. See why it's too simplistic? There's LOADS of other examples, but I'm going to a User's Group, so I'll be by later. BYE! |
