|
Anyone else agree? | by SparkyR | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Wasn't Tim Robbins | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 10:24:23 |
|
Dude... | by Illiad | 2003-04-17 10:27:16 |
|
Illustrating the absurd | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 10:56:03 |
|
Talk about absurd. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:03:14 |
|
Sparky, I think you misread desertrat | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:07:39 |
|
Nope. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:14:31 |
|
*grins* | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:26:13 |
|
yes, I agree. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:41:58 |
|
I do believe | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:46:46 |
|
that would be amazing indeed. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:54:40 |
|
the answer | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:11:50 |
|
Hey, we hang out here with you. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:37:43 |
|
Methinks all that newting has affected your brain | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 12:44:31 |
| You're assuming, though, that Robbins |
by NOLAWitch |
2003-04-17 12:50:04 |
| only hangs out with Socialists, Communists and others you deem unAmerican. You don't really know if his associations are limited to those groups only. That would be like if by posting back and forth to you, someone painted me with the same political brush as yours. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
He's an actor isn't he? | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 13:23:23 |
|
So are Charlton Heston and Ronald Reagan. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 13:28:46 |
|
Ah but they are not working actors | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:17:06 |
|
Really? Where? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:19:39 |
|
Of course not | by Nea | 2003-04-17 15:15:18 |
|
Time for a new law | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:56:09 |
|
It also seems to me that the majority | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 14:00:41 |
|
I thought you were really funny... | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:07:48 |
|
When was the last time | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:15:11 |
|
ROFLMAO | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:16:58 |
|
Nice, real nice | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:21:53 |
|
This is degenerating rapidly | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:32:33 |
|
You spout a lot, but refuse to be informed | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:35:39 |
|
Nope. Not because Arnold is an | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:42:15 |
|
I think you missed a bit back there. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:38:54 |
|
You did NOT read the article. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:51:05 |
|
I did read much, and skimmed the rest. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:57:02 |
|
Granted that Mr. Robbin's claims | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 13:58:34 |
|
It depends on whether | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:11:03 |
|
I don't dispute their right to do so... | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:22:46 |
|
Who made the announcement public? | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:30:56 |
|
Good questions. | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:52:55 |
|
No. I only know what has been presented here. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 15:00:28 |