|
Anyone else agree? | by SparkyR | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Wasn't Tim Robbins | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 10:24:23 |
|
Dude... | by Illiad | 2003-04-17 10:27:16 |
|
Illustrating the absurd | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 10:56:03 |
|
Talk about absurd. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:03:14 |
|
Sparky, I think you misread desertrat | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:07:39 |
|
Nope. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:14:31 |
| *grins* |
by bitflipper |
2003-04-17 11:26:13 |
I've got to admire restraint like that... Not to mention the subtlety...
O-kay, Sparky, I guess I misread your statements; sorry about that. But, don't you think it is just typical human nature to try to lump people together and stick a label on them? I'm not saying that it's proper or by any means acceptable to do so, just that it is what typically happens. I think that's DR66's point: if person X acts in a way that makes them seem like their views are similar to extremist group G, then that person will be considered a member of that group. Similarly, if X openly associates with known members of group G, that person will be considered a member of that group.
Now, I, personally, find such generalizations to be of questionable validity, but I even catch myself making them from time to time. Whether DR66 believes it is valid to make such a generalization I will leave for hir to say. But I think we would all have to agree that those generalizations are made regularly and by a majority of the population. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
yes, I agree. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:41:58 |
|
I do believe | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:46:46 |
|
that would be amazing indeed. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:54:40 |
|
the answer | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:11:50 |
|
Hey, we hang out here with you. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:37:43 |
|
Methinks all that newting has affected your brain | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 12:44:31 |
|
You're assuming, though, that Robbins | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:50:04 |
|
He's an actor isn't he? | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 13:23:23 |
|
So are Charlton Heston and Ronald Reagan. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 13:28:46 |
|
Ah but they are not working actors | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:17:06 |
|
Really? Where? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:19:39 |
|
Of course not | by Nea | 2003-04-17 15:15:18 |
|
Time for a new law | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:56:09 |
|
It also seems to me that the majority | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 14:00:41 |
|
I thought you were really funny... | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:07:48 |
|
When was the last time | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:15:11 |
|
ROFLMAO | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:16:58 |
|
Nice, real nice | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:21:53 |
|
This is degenerating rapidly | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:32:33 |
|
You spout a lot, but refuse to be informed | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:35:39 |
|
Nope. Not because Arnold is an | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:42:15 |
|
I think you missed a bit back there. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:38:54 |
|
You did NOT read the article. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:51:05 |
|
I did read much, and skimmed the rest. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:57:02 |
|
Granted that Mr. Robbin's claims | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 13:58:34 |
|
It depends on whether | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:11:03 |
|
I don't dispute their right to do so... | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:22:46 |
|
Who made the announcement public? | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:30:56 |
|
Good questions. | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:52:55 |
|
No. I only know what has been presented here. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 15:00:28 |
|
The reply | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:30:36 |
