| Anyone else agree? |
by SparkyR |
2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
"And these same people that tolerate the real violence of war don't want to see the result of it on the nightly news. Unlike the rest of the world, our news coverage of this war remains sanitized, without a glimpse of the blood and gore inflicted upon our soldiers or the women and children in Iraq. Violence as a concept, an abstraction -- it's very strange.
As we applaud the hard-edged realism of the opening battle scene of "Saving Private Ryan," we cringe at the thought of seeing the same on the nightly news. We are told it would be pornographic. We want no part of reality in real life. We demand that war be painstakingly realized on the screen, but that war remain imagined and conceptualized in real life. "
An excerpt from
Text of Tim Robbins speech
Transcript of actor's address to National Press Club
Link to whole article here
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
And don't forget! | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 10:22:27 |
|
Only you would know, LP. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 10:27:48 |
|
No, I did actually mean my post. | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 10:30:42 |
|
Aw, man... | by Illiad | 2003-04-17 10:31:33 |
|
Yeah, ok, "stupid" wasn't fair. | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 10:33:47 |
|
An easier way to look at it is | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:05:53 |
|
Yeeesss... | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 11:10:50 |
|
Agreed to a point | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:23:13 |
|
Wasn't Tim Robbins | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 10:24:23 |
|
Dude... | by Illiad | 2003-04-17 10:27:16 |
|
Illustrating the absurd | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 10:56:03 |
|
Talk about absurd. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:03:14 |
|
Sparky, I think you misread desertrat | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:07:39 |
|
Nope. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:14:31 |
|
*grins* | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:26:13 |
|
yes, I agree. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:41:58 |
|
I do believe | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:46:46 |
|
that would be amazing indeed. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:54:40 |
|
the answer | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:11:50 |
|
Hey, we hang out here with you. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:37:43 |
|
Methinks all that newting has affected your brain | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 12:44:31 |
|
You're assuming, though, that Robbins | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:50:04 |
|
He's an actor isn't he? | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 13:23:23 |
|
So are Charlton Heston and Ronald Reagan. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 13:28:46 |
|
Ah but they are not working actors | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:17:06 |
|
Really? Where? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:19:39 |
|
Of course not | by Nea | 2003-04-17 15:15:18 |
|
Time for a new law | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:56:09 |
|
It also seems to me that the majority | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 14:00:41 |
|
I thought you were really funny... | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:07:48 |
|
When was the last time | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:15:11 |
|
ROFLMAO | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:16:58 |
|
Nice, real nice | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:21:53 |
|
This is degenerating rapidly | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:32:33 |
|
You spout a lot, but refuse to be informed | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:35:39 |
|
Nope. Not because Arnold is an | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:42:15 |
|
I think you missed a bit back there. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:38:54 |
|
You did NOT read the article. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:51:05 |
|
I did read much, and skimmed the rest. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:57:02 |
|
Granted that Mr. Robbin's claims | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 13:58:34 |
|
It depends on whether | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:11:03 |
|
I don't dispute their right to do so... | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:22:46 |
|
Who made the announcement public? | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:30:56 |
|
Good questions. | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:52:55 |
|
No. I only know what has been presented here. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 15:00:28 |
|
The reply | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:30:36 |
|
*sigh* | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:09:20 |
|
*sigh* guess you don't either. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:24:08 |
|
Nyet | by Illiad | 2003-04-17 11:04:12 |
|
You can start | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:16:59 |
|
Are they American Communists? | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 11:20:41 |
|
Communism is anti-American! | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 11:22:22 |
|
When you consider | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:26:05 |
|
If this country decided to elect Communists, | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 11:30:10 |
|
Apples Oranges | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 11:40:34 |
|
"Revolution calling..." | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:49:14 |
|
In case you missed it | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:00:51 |
|
Precisely why we need organizations like the NRA | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:02:10 |
|
Uh, not quite | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:14:18 |
|
they can't stay in tanks forever.... (n/t) | by rottweiler | 2003-04-17 12:19:42 |
|
Problem is | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:20:48 |
|
If the well-informed | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:50:43 |
|
Yeah, do y'all want Blind FrogBoy | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:51:56 |
|
Are you saying blind frogboy will be able to find | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:54:13 |
|
Ok, frogboy, we believe you. (n/t) | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:06:50 |
|
Well informed | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 13:28:41 |
|
that's why we need to spend | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:14:43 |
|
Indeed | by desertrat66 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Different priorities | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:22:15 |
|
Doh! | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:25:39 |
|
I'd rather have a well-informed citizenry. | by NOLAWitch | 2003-04-17 12:36:37 |
|
That is also necessary, in both directions | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:40:57 |
|
Besides, Patrick Swayze proved it would work. | by JPaganel | 2003-04-17 12:26:44 |
|
for this paranoid cynic, please make that | by tnglives | 2003-04-17 12:16:03 |
|
My friend, I agree it's daunting. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:43:56 |
|
heavens to Betsy, no! | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:16:42 |
|
Well you needn't worry | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:18:42 |
|
Now you're inebriated. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 12:25:23 |
|
I disagree, he makes a valid point about rewarding | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:28:57 |
|
'Cause all terrorists "demands" | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:36:29 |
|
No, but every society has flaws | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:44:17 |
|
C'mon slacktime | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:45:04 |
|
Funny that | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 13:54:36 |
|
My friend. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:10:04 |
|
Time to quibble | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:20:03 |
|
They're *all* jokes. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:28:49 |
|
Crimes may be understandable... | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:45:45 |
|
I didn't say that | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:45:40 |
|
Now? You seem to think acts of terrorism are new. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:16:36 |
|
Excuse the phrase "terror tactics" | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:13:38 |
|
So, if neither side begins | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:52:56 |
|
My statement | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:40:20 |
|
Dude, you're still out? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:02:03 |
|
Okay so | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 13:16:12 |
|
See, here's where you miss the details. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:21:12 |
|
ok let's assume you are a great guy | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 13:30:54 |
|
Get over yourself already. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:38:39 |
|
You get over your stupid obsession | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 13:41:58 |
|
I never HAD that obsession. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:53:09 |
|
But you refuse to acknowledge the concept | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:08:26 |
|
You refuse to bend to good sense. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:15:44 |
|
People scream when we're active in world affairs | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 14:29:39 |
|
Apples to oranges. ;-) | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:41:05 |
|
You're the only one doing that. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 12:08:40 |
|
We ain't got no bananas! (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 12:12:16 |
|
Naruki... | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 12:16:07 |
|
Got proof? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 12:27:10 |
|
yeah, wasn't T. McVeigh | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:28:48 |
|
Don't worry SparkyR | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 14:28:48 |
|
I'm just turning the other cheek, | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:43:58 |
|
The ones who follow the Communist Manifesto | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:31:58 |
|
Bingo | by desertrat66 | 2003-04-17 12:34:53 |
|
hmmm | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:54:52 |
|
Don't know anything about | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 11:34:19 |
|
They haven't finished installing the 'showers' | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 10:27:55 |
|
funny you should mention this. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 10:32:47 |
|
Used to revere I'm afraid | by SaleGamine | 2003-04-17 10:37:37 |
|
Doesn't have to be! | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 10:43:37 |
|
Heh, | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 10:45:50 |
|
yes, I understand the humour LP | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 10:56:18 |
|
Yes, there's a serious side. | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 11:01:28 |
|
Speaking Greek to me, my friend. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:09:05 |
|
Quantum Mechanics is easier to grasp | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:11:04 |
|
Quantum Mechanics are easier to grasp | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 11:19:54 |
|
Yeah, in QM's there are *laws*. :) (n/t) | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:28:29 |
|
I thought they were more like guidelines? (n/t) | by Vetitice | 2003-04-17 11:54:22 |
|
Honestly don't know. | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 11:16:04 |
|
Tell you what | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 11:33:59 |
|
Not bloody likely. ;) (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-04-17 12:14:56 |
|
Darn ;) | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 12:34:25 |
|
But LP had a point there | by SaleGamine | 2003-04-17 11:03:51 |
|
So typical US ignorance is rearing | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:16:41 |
|
And I feel bad for them | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 11:17:40 |
|
Sorry, that's something I don't get | by SaleGamine | 2003-04-17 11:27:21 |
|
well, it is a popular fallacy | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 11:43:47 |
|
Not entirely | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 11:03:16 |
|
Well said. | by theymustbidiots | 2003-04-17 11:43:58 |
|
Agreed. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 10:37:55 |
|
See my other post this thread. (n/t) | by DesertRat66 | 2003-04-17 10:58:09 |
|
I don't know ... | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 10:45:49 |
|
Then why aren't you angry now? | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 10:49:19 |
|
Because I am a simpleton and I believe | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 10:53:37 |
|
You're not a simpleton, and you're | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:21:41 |
|
Tell me what conclusions I'm avoiding? (n/t) | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 11:25:21 |
|
I can't presume to know. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 11:33:45 |
|
Well best I can tell at this point... | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:12:17 |
|
In conclusion, | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:23:53 |
|
Mixed reaction | by slacktime | 2003-04-17 12:33:50 |
|
balance is good. | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 12:38:42 |
|
But then should | by hyzenthlay | 2003-04-17 11:27:18 |
|
I say yes. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:47:57 |
|
Sorry, you don't get off the hook that easily | by SaleGamine | 2003-04-17 11:43:29 |
|
yeah... that's where I form my political opinions | by rottweiler | 2003-04-17 11:39:24 |
|
His speech disturbs me | by hyzenthlay | 2003-04-17 11:56:14 |
|
Damn, that's a good speech. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 13:51:53 |
|
The great thing is, | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 13:58:59 |
|
No it isn't. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 13:59:20 |
|
*sigh*. without going into it all again, | by SparkyR | 2003-04-17 14:02:15 |
|
I think you're a bad liar. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:06:34 |
|
Right here. About 12 paragraphs down. | by BloodyViking | 2003-04-17 14:15:35 |
|
Thanks for proving me right. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 14:33:14 |
|
Conceded. | by BloodyViking | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
You're right. | by Naruki | 2003-04-17 20:00:17 |
|
But give him his due | by bitflipper | 2003-04-17 14:07:23 |
|
The banner ad at the bottom of that article | by BlurOfSerenity | 2003-04-17 14:24:07 |