Actually i never worked with gdb. (hmm... gnu debugger, that is.)
Some work mates use it for debuging some old sources under Sinix and Linux, and from what I heard they are pretty happy about it.
(which, some sort of surprised me, coz the gnu-c-compiler sucked big time.)
However, it is not my decition, the team is allways working with one tool. ( Of course if I make a small one-man project, I can choose the tool and language.)
Right now I work with Visual C++
When I'm back from USA I will round up some Java, and programm some servlets in Eclipse.
And the next thing I know, is a C# program comming on.
(We used java some time for applications, but after all Clients run NT4 or XP (NT 5.1) and java buisness applications are so damn slow, most of the programmers where glad to try something else ... except of a few hard-core-linux-and-java-is-the-bets-stuff-guys.)
Question should be: Is it good or bad that we get told where to develope?
No: because most of the time, the guys who tell's us are managment and have no clue at all!!
Yes: otherwise some programmers would start holy wars about whats better ... C++ or java ... or maybe even C#? |
