The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Separation of Church and State in the U.S.? by BuggedEyes2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Meaning of separation by piroufreek2003-04-02 10:51:23
    You are wrong. by Route2003-04-02 11:00:30
      Link by piroufreek2006-11-19 12:55:59
        I'll have some counter-links later. by Arcanum 2006-11-19 12:55:59
I've got them bookmarked at home, but I'm in class on a laptop right now.

In the mean time, answer me this: If the Founding Fathers intended for religion to be allowed in government, why is it that religion is conspicuously absent from the Constitution, except for admonishments to exclude it, and a single reference to "In the Year of our Lord" (a common formality of the time)? Even in the Presidential Oath of Office, the only Oath of Office dictated verbatim in the Constitution, there is not a single reference to God or even a Creator.

[ Reply ]
          Absent? by piroufreek2003-04-02 11:23:26
            Linky by BuggedEyes2006-11-19 12:55:59
              Sources by piroufreek2003-04-02 11:30:48
                Rights come from the Creator. by BuggedEyes2003-04-02 11:38:39
                  Not at all by piroufreek2003-04-02 11:45:44
            "their Creator" not "the Creator" by NOLAWitch2003-04-02 11:26:04
              Okay by piroufreek2003-04-02 11:28:35
            Yes, absent. by Arcanum2003-04-02 11:36:51
              Points by piroufreek2003-04-02 11:42:10
                The fallacy of your logic... by BuggedEyes2006-11-19 12:55:59
                I should've been more clear. by Arcanum2003-04-02 12:50:49

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)