This is a war against Iraq, its fighting Iraqi soldiers, its in Iraq, and Iraqi civilians are dying.
They may have been dying before, but I'm pretty sure they weren't dying by US Bombs.
Why should Saddam have left? What right does the USA have to tell the leader of a soverign nation to leave his country? What right does the US have to go against the United Nations when it comes to a war? As for the weapons of mass destruction, no proof has been found yet that he has them, so your obscure comment is useless. When they find something then I'll give you that, but even then they should have gone about it the right way (UN weapon inspectors) and not by attacking a soverign nation without any proof. |
