| OK, UFies whose native language is NOT English... |
by McNutcase |
2003-03-18 11:18:20 |
| is the use of "check" for both "ascertain, examine" and "variable-value banknote" confusing? Should check and cheque be spelt separately? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I don't see why you wouldn't... | by IByte | 2003-03-18 11:22:40 |
|
Llyr refuses to admit that... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:24:30 |
|
Next thing ya know | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 11:25:48 |
|
It's not illiterate... | by rapido75 | 2003-03-18 16:37:36 |
|
Yes please | by SaleGamine | 2003-03-18 11:23:35 |
|
As far as I'm concerned, | by Shadowclaw | 2003-03-18 11:26:09 |
|
yes, but... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:28:40 |
|
and which one gets applied to... | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 11:29:29 |
|
the q-spelling, I reckon, for the first... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:31:25 |
|
And what does a game of checkers ... | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 11:35:46 |
|
one shot per piece captured of course | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:38:54 |
|
Leave it to the limey | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 11:40:39 |
|
Very true... | by Buffy_Fett | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
it's not a contest... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:42:00 |
|
Now listen here | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 11:48:06 |
|
FWIW I'm an American... | by desertrat66 | 2003-03-18 11:27:54 |
|
thanks! (n/t) | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 11:29:33 |
|
ditto (n/t) | by Nea | 2003-03-18 11:55:20 |
|
AOL! (n/t) | by DaNutBall | 2003-03-18 12:05:42 |
|
Harumph! You should use Canadian spelling. (n/t) | by curly | 2003-03-18 12:35:39 |
|
Technically speaking... | by desertrat66 | 2003-03-18 13:24:29 |
|
I often do it... | by rapido75 | 2003-03-18 16:33:20 |
|
Of course not, and of course not. :) (n/t) | by Llyr | 2003-03-18 11:30:46 |
|
So you admit your 'native language' is not English | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 11:55:30 |
|
I also speak French | by Pic | 2003-03-18 11:32:58 |
|
I'm old and reactionary. I believe that | by LurkerMo | 2003-03-18 11:37:31 |
|
That's watt a goode spell Czech doz four ewe! (n/t | by curly | 2003-03-18 12:50:26 |
|
What does a spell check have to do with | by LurkerMo | 2003-03-18 12:56:25 |
|
You said, I said | by curly | 2003-03-18 13:37:57 |
|
Thanks. That clears up the confusion. | by LurkerMo | 2003-03-18 15:57:08 |
|
I don't find it confusing | by Afterburner | 2003-03-18 11:41:53 |
|
Gah! Meant that cheque feels more right | by Afterburner | 2003-03-18 12:02:24 |
|
yeap it would be good | by OzanBABA | 2003-03-18 11:49:14 |
|
Agreed. | by rapido75 | 2003-03-18 16:38:50 |
|
It's all about the context... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 11:59:03 |
|
ok then wiseguy... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:02:11 |
|
I spoke too soon... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:05:51 |
|
who said English was logical? | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:07:31 |
|
So then the question I must ask is... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:12:33 |
|
I was discussing things with Llyr via AIM... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:18:17 |
|
I bet it's used a lot... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:24:28 |
|
AFAIK... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:27:30 |
|
It's all wrong! Use 'cola'! | by LionsPhil | 2003-03-18 12:30:42 |
|
but that's another syllable! | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:33:09 |
|
But that only applies to | by Arcanum | 2003-03-18 15:17:08 |
|
Soda pop. | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 16:20:51 |
|
Yup... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:31:41 |
|
do what I do | by JamesG | 2003-03-18 12:30:41 |
|
Not leaving, but... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:34:14 |
|
The soda vs. pop battle rages in a lot of places | by Nea | 2003-03-18 12:50:22 |
|
but that was *me* talking... ;) (n/t) | by krupa | 2003-03-18 14:13:39 |
|
past tense of go == golt? | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:15:14 |
|
yup, I was meaning... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 12:21:25 |
|
Of course not... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:26:29 |
|
So you never met Sister Mary Elephant? | by curly | 2003-03-18 15:28:38 |
|
You're an idiot. | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 16:18:04 |
|
Yes. | by LionsPhil | 2003-03-18 12:23:49 |
|
*Checks krupa into the boards* | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 12:35:12 |
|
aww... | by krupa | 2003-03-18 12:38:48 |
|
I thought it was rather ascertaining :-) (n/t) | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 12:57:55 |
|
there are instances of this in all languages | by JamesG | 2003-03-18 12:20:48 |
|
Confusing? No. | by Spiff | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
No. However, | by JPaganel | 2003-03-18 12:36:51 |
|
you mean the receipt? (n/t) | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 12:41:52 |
|
That's the other confusing word. (n/t) | by JPaganel | 2003-03-18 13:06:00 |
|
No and no (n/t) | by TheNewt | 2003-03-18 12:37:39 |
|
As a native english speaker | by hyzenthlay | 2003-03-18 12:48:32 |
|
Check is used only as a verb? Since when? (n/t) | by LurkerMo | 2003-03-18 12:53:44 |
|
No | by hyzenthlay | 2003-03-18 13:00:41 |
|
When you say 'English', | by LionsPhil | 2003-03-18 13:04:54 |
|
and furthermore... | by McNutcase | 2003-03-18 13:06:58 |
|
Ok ok | by hyzenthlay | 2003-03-18 13:29:40 |
|
I'd just say that the chance for confusion is so | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 15:29:05 |
|
Oh, come on. | by rapido75 | 2003-03-18 16:44:50 |
|
not quite | by Nea | 2003-03-18 12:54:52 |
|
ka-shwing? (n/t) | by krupa | 2003-03-18 14:17:58 |
|
Consider this: The only language I know | by LurkerMo | 2003-03-18 12:52:08 |
|
Actualy I believe it was | by Taciturnia | 2003-03-18 12:55:49 |
|
Czech checked cheque checker. | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 13:24:03 |
|
Or a Czech cheque check check. | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 13:25:40 |
|
The confusion arises when | by jeff_uk | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Old joke... | by Buffy_Fett | 2003-03-18 14:03:21 |
|
OOhhh that was BAD!!! LOL!! (n/t) | by slacktime | 2003-03-18 14:18:28 |
|
Ys it should | by Spisefisken | 2003-03-18 14:31:20 |
|
And the word for 'agreed'/'concurred' | by Spisefisken | 2003-03-18 14:57:05 |
|
*LARTs all who think "cheque" is more correct* | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 15:34:07 |
|
What's the etymology then? (n/t) | by kahuana | 2003-03-18 15:44:15 |
|
Oh, no. | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 16:15:09 |
|
What about those of us | by Nea | 2003-03-18 16:51:11 |
|
Nothing wrong with that.. | by rapido75 | 2003-03-18 17:33:53 |
|
Um : wrong | by jedidiahstott | 2003-03-19 00:26:56 |
|
That's your choice. | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 17:38:26 |
|
Oh, and I also object to people... | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 17:39:34 |
|
It's from "sakk", isn't it? (n/t) | by Llyr | 2003-03-18 19:48:06 |
|
If it is, then I missed it. | by Naruki | 2003-03-18 20:33:10 |
|
We use both here | by Arienadean | 2003-03-18 21:07:41 |