UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

The flaw in the "wait for UN approval" argument.	by slayer	2003-03-18 01:02:39
Actually..	by NuclearWinter	2003-03-18 01:11:30
I hope we look like mean evil people.	by slayer	2003-03-18 01:17:23
Don't give up on humanity so easily.	by skeptic	2003-03-18 01:26:09
This is very true	by jedidiahstott	2003-03-18 02:46:59
I don't think what you're saying here is fair...	by chatgris	2003-03-18 03:08:43
It is a matter of respect for the law	by jedidiahstott	2003-03-18 03:33:00
International law is that no state will wage war except in self defense against attack, or with the mandate of the UN. The US is thus in violation of international law. The fact that Iraq is a (blankety blank) is completely irrelevant. If the UN said that Iraq was out of line and asked the US (or whoever) to go in and sort out Mr Hussein, we would all cheer from the side lines(Analogy: I believe that my next door neighbours are manufacturing drugs. That does not entitle me to go over with a shotgun and blow them away.In civilised states, I call the police, and abide by their action). If the time is up on Iraq , it's up to the UN to make that call. Most (all?) of the smaller nations of the world are now thinking "If the US openly despises international law , what happens if we find ourselves in disagreement with the US. Presumably , we get a US attack force descend on us ?" .And bear in mind that I come from a country that is one of the most democratic in the world and the only country to officially outlaw all WMD - including those of the USA which brought a lot of US antagonism down on us - reflected in trade embargoes etc - when we told them their nuclear armed and fuelled ships were not welcome . Now I wonder if it would bring bombers down on us.
[ Reply ]
I should have added "UK and Australia also"	by jedidiahstott	2003-03-18 03:35:03
You should have added some carriage returns.	by Naruki	2003-03-18 04:33:29
With that in mind	by buddha	2003-03-18 08:26:05
The US is establishing a dangerous precedent	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 10:53:17
Setting a precident?	by Arcanum	2003-03-18 11:48:18
The precedent of a country being able to	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 12:41:00
Not really	by slacktime	2003-03-18 12:51:42
I mentioned Iraq and Kuwait as an example	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 13:09:58
50 years of tradiition?	by slacktime	2003-03-18 13:23:51
Understand LurkerMo	by slacktime	2003-03-18 14:14:56
I believe that the danger of what the US is doing	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 15:23:42
Please, look at history for a second.	by chatgris	2003-03-18 15:38:24
I'm glad that you have such faith in the benevo-	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 16:14:34
The fact that no UN sanction existed is	by LurkerMo	2003-03-18 15:14:07
Self defence is different from attack.	by Vetitice	2003-03-18 16:40:28

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)