The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Looking for answers by colmtourque2003-03-07 12:22:30
  A few points by aix tom2006-11-19 12:55:59
    Thanks again by colmtourque 2003-03-07 20:30:27
have seen many CIA officials and ex-officials on the news that have tried to tell the administraton that there is no proof whatsoever that there are WMD in Iraq. But according to them Rumsfeld has gathered some civilians and pr-people who now put together a few facts to prove something that's not proven. Yes, clinton chief said something a while back to that affect. After spending 8 years telling a very different story. I also watched on Powell testify before the Congress and the UN with images, pictures, names and dates showing WMD in Iraq. It is also very likely that the risc of terrorist attacks on the US will RISE when they invade Iraq. The US is at war. We will be attacked again. Taking down one bankroll will hopefull lesson the affect And if you want to remove everybody who isn't complying with the UN you will have to remove a lot of people, including Sharon for example. (Still not complying to resolution 242 from 1967). And you better remove G.W. Bush to be shure, he has said many times that he will attack Iraq even if the UN decides against it. Yes, I know Sharon. Israil (see below) is quite troubling as well. Bush is not defying the UN by attacking. Unless the pass a resolution saying that he can't. Which they have not done. They will probably say the UN won't. Since most of the funding for Al Quada seems to come from Saudi Arabia (And most of the attackers from 9/11, too) why not attack them ? They are also a dictatorship. And some of their religios leaders sound very much like Osama I think after we have a democracy in Iraq that their problems will change. And please SA is a Monarchy :) Furthermore going to war with the objectives the Bush administration has in mind might be horrible mistake. Ten reaons against it from a veteran of Desert Storm So my main problem with the actions of the Bush administration is they throw all resouces at this war against Iraq, and almost nothing is done to really prevent terrorism. They are putting on a show. And a very bad one, to boot. I admit I have not read the ten reasons yet. I do plan to. We just caught the number 3 guy I do not think this is a sham just to divert attention. I think this is a serious attempt to remove money from terrorist. I read the ten reasons by the way. Thanks. Thanks again for your answer, I appreciate it.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)