UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Bush and intelligence	by BrainBug	2003-03-07 08:46:58
Hey, lured you in with that subject? Well, great - but for once I don't mean to pick on dubya's IQ (not directly anyway). Yesterday I saw a report on TV concerning Bush's intelligence information on Iraq. They interviewed several former and current CIA agents and quoted a report from head of CIA J.Tenet all saying the following: - CIA knows nothing about chemical weapons or c weapon factories in Iraq - If Saddam still has C-weapons they are burried so good that it would take him weeks if not months to reactivate them and bring them to use - There is no known connection between Saddam and any terrorist organization including Al Quaida. Furthermore Saddam "draws a strict line" on that matter and doesn't seem to want any such connection. - Iraq won't manage to create nuclear weapons before the end of the decade - Iraq doesn't stir or make any threating moves and is unlikely to do so in the predictable future Oh, and based on that a former CIA agent who was around since Nixon said that Bush was the most stubborn president he had to deal with and completely advice resistent... And only a few hours after aforementioned report became known Bush seems to have given a press conference blurping out his usual sermon: - Saddam supports terrorist organizations and might give them weapons of mass destruction at any time - Iraq is an immediate thread because of the chemical weapons they already have and can use at any time and the nuclear weapons they soon will have So, has anybody seen/heard anything more about that CIA report? Any comments about these somewhat contradicting positions?
[ Reply ]
That report does not exist and never has done. (n/	by LionsPhil	2003-03-07 08:48:40
and to clarify...	by BrainBug	2003-03-07 08:54:15
And to be specific:	by webishop	2003-03-07 09:00:15
quotes:	by BrainBug	2003-03-07 09:19:27
That last one reminded me of something...	by Vetitice	2003-03-07 09:27:30
I think it's more	by Egaeus	2003-03-07 10:08:30
Iraq has a known connection	by leunnammi	2003-03-07 08:58:14
. . . but not w/ al Qaeda or bin Laden	by skwanch	2003-03-07 09:21:29
I've said this in other places	by leunnammi	2003-03-07 09:26:17
How do you figure that?	by skwanch	2003-03-07 09:41:20
Given the unpredictability of scientific	by Adiplomat	2003-03-07 09:45:46
The technology is sitting.	by leunnammi	2003-03-07 10:01:57
I'm not going to bother, here. You've been making	by Adiplomat	2003-03-07 10:11:45
Which ones where unsupported?	by leunnammi	2003-03-07 10:27:56
All of them.	by geminidomino2	2003-03-07 10:39:39
I'm shooting	by leunnammi	2003-03-07 10:00:46
just to show ya what I mean . . .	by skwanch	2003-03-07 12:58:41
Minor math error?	by Vetitice	2003-03-07 13:34:45
aaah ... good point. Thx (n/t)	by skwanch	2003-03-07 17:00:22
Here in Europe (esp. Germany)...	by Argos	2003-03-07 10:50:16
Guess the Spanish blew it	by kahuana	2003-03-07 11:42:17
Agreed	by Kickstart	2003-03-07 13:02:09
Say it yesterday too.	by aix tom	2006-11-19 12:55:59
That memo is addressed to the president?	by geminidomino2	2003-03-07 11:05:38
that's the one I saw, too!	by BrainBug	2003-03-07 11:11:41
Therw was discourse on this	by Tran	2003-03-07 12:33:37

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)