|
Why would God create Hell? | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 10:47:32 |
|
Do you want an honest answer? | by Buffy_Fett | 2003-02-27 10:58:05 |
|
Now that's an interesting answer. | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 11:04:02 |
|
As adiplomat said - no | by Buffy_Fett | 2003-02-27 11:19:55 |
| Mm. So God condemned me to Hell. |
by Naruki |
2003-02-27 11:23:19 |
For He is the one who forced me not to take on faith absurd logic, and yet He requires it at the same time.
I am made such that _knowing_ something is required to trust it, if I am supposed to make a choice. The more important the choice, the more I have to know the truth.
Since that is potentially the most important choice I'd ever have to make, I'd have to be absolutely sure before I made it. But He won't allow that by His choice.
Seems pretty twisted to me. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
{{{Naruki}}} | by BuggedEyes | 2003-02-27 11:27:41 |
|
Doggonit Naruki! You would have to go and | by BuggedEyes | 2003-02-27 11:29:40 |
|
You cannot *know* everything | by Buffy_Fett | 2003-02-27 11:46:20 |
|
LART | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 11:55:26 |
|
You changed the nature of the question. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 12:20:56 |
|
Nope. | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 12:27:05 |
|
Um, yes. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 12:38:05 |
|
Actually | by Buffy_Fett | 2003-02-27 12:36:00 |
|
Unless "everything" is just 3 things. | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 12:53:02 |
|
It's that first thing. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 13:04:13 |
|
I'm curious | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 13:17:32 |
|
Because it eliminates our choice. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 13:31:08 |
|
Someone who is: | by randomman | 2003-02-27 13:34:11 |
|
We'd still have a choice | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 13:50:49 |
|
Yeah, that's a BIG difference. | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 13:59:18 |
|
So you don't believe in God. At least, not | by LurkerMo | 2003-02-27 14:20:06 |
|
Interesting twist for cyberspace. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 14:36:09 |
|
Either way, [s]he's passed the Turing test. 8) (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2003-02-27 14:40:42 |
|
Do I pass the Turing test? | by LurkerMo | 2003-02-27 14:40:59 |
|
Why else would I communicate like what? | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 14:49:14 |
|
You (and I am assuming here that you are a you) | by LurkerMo | 2003-02-27 14:55:31 |
|
Well, given your statement: | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 15:12:47 |
|
It is significant to me. YMMV. | by LurkerMo | 2003-02-27 15:18:32 |
|
<Deleted> | <Deleted> | 2003-02-27 15:53:46 |
|
Oops, mods. | by LionsPhil | 2003-02-27 15:54:59 |
|
Moderated as requested (n/t) | by Nea | 2003-02-27 16:40:21 |
|
Am I a person? Define 'person'. | by LionsPhil | 2003-02-27 15:54:34 |
|
This is an empirical matter | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 15:02:20 |
|
So you believe in God, and also believe that you | by LurkerMo | 2003-02-27 15:28:51 |
|
Have you read the rest of this thread? | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 15:48:28 |
|
How would that eliminate the choice? | by MikeCDN | 2003-02-27 14:50:50 |
|
I think it's because | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 15:54:22 |
|
He didn't force you to do anything. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 12:13:59 |
|
Gödel's Incompleteness Theorem | by Taolie | 2003-02-27 12:35:22 |
|
And so you begin on your path to zen... (n/t) | by randomman | 2003-02-27 13:01:17 |
|
And this, | by LionsPhil | 2003-02-27 14:15:50 |
