|
Front Door Vistors | by JedaiBesk | 2003-02-27 05:42:17 |
|
Which is why you should always speak properly. | by pecosdave | 2003-02-27 05:44:53 |
|
slight correction | by plblark | 2003-02-27 06:43:12 |
|
Calling NOLAWitch... | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 06:59:20 |
|
It just bugs me a little is all... | by plblark | 2003-02-27 07:05:14 |
|
At a guess, I'd say the "Jesus Christ" part. ;-P | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 07:13:20 |
|
heh! | by plblark | 2003-02-27 07:34:23 |
|
I'd have to disagree on that first sentence | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 08:08:38 |
|
well, yes, if it WERE the word of god directly | by plblark | 2003-02-27 08:22:06 |
|
So then | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 08:34:34 |
|
I think His rules are plain enough | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 08:57:53 |
|
Wait a minute | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 09:05:56 |
|
Oh I don't disagree | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 09:14:51 |
|
I agree | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 09:31:19 |
|
Maybe this will help | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 10:00:50 |
|
Not quite adequate | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 10:14:24 |
|
Maybe there is more to you | by slacktime | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| But we keep coming to the question |
by Egaeus |
2003-02-27 10:47:53 |
| of how we can be free when God knows all of our choices beforehand. This is the real issue.
Oh, and as for your link: A vision given to Joseph Smith the Prophet and Sidney Rigdon, at Hiram, Ohio, February 16, 1832
There's no reason for him to sound like friggin' shakespeare in 1832. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Huh? | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 10:54:00 |
|
I think he was referring to this: | by Spiff | 2003-02-27 11:01:52 |
|
I wonder what he thinks of Isaiah... ;) (n/t) | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 11:03:10 |
|
There's quite a difference | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:30:43 |
|
I'm still talking confusing style. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 11:39:32 |
|
That's all I ask | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:43:33 |
|
Just the style | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:02:30 |
|
Too bad | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 11:05:54 |
|
So God should change his style to suit us? | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 11:20:33 |
|
It seems that | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:29:14 |
|
So you *do* want a translation. | by YakkoWarner | 2003-02-27 11:36:52 |
|
You are saying the Joe was 200 years old? | by Naruki | 2003-02-27 11:53:02 |
|
I have no problem understanding | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 12:14:06 |
|
Hold on... | by Spiff | 2003-02-27 11:58:16 |
|
so knowledge removes freedom? | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 10:58:10 |
|
That's the crux of the longtime debate | by Nea | 2003-02-27 11:22:56 |
|
And we aren't likely going to solve it today? | by slacktime | 2003-02-27 11:32:28 |
|
The latter option doesn't fly. | by Arcanum | 2003-02-27 11:44:34 |
|
weakened omniscience | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:54:37 |
|
Yes. So is weakened omnipotence. :) | by Arcanum | 2003-02-27 11:56:04 |
|
Turn it around | by Ston | 2003-02-27 12:28:05 |
|
So he knows some things? | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 12:32:57 |
|
No | by Ston | 2003-02-27 12:54:29 |
|
But if he knows the actions we will take | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 12:58:37 |
|
Because you're not getting it. | by YakkoWarner | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
It didn't (n/t) | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 13:25:26 |
|
Nope, still doesn't work. | by Arcanum | 2003-02-27 14:42:32 |
|
When we're talking about God, absolutely | by Egaeus | 2003-02-27 11:34:35 |