The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
Front Door Vistors by JedaiBesk2003-02-27 05:42:17
  Which is why you should always speak properly. by pecosdave2003-02-27 05:44:53
    slight correction by plblark 2003-02-27 06:43:12
Mormons (at least the central Church of JEsus Christ of Latter Day Saints) do NOT practice multiple marriages in any way, shape, or form. Actually, it's a good way to get kicked out of the LDS IIRC.
There WAS a church teaching in the past supporting Multiple wives, (probably to get their population up for self defense ... they DID go to war with the US Govt over Utah for awhile ...
That teaching has been CHANGED however, and modern mormons do NOT practice this.

There ARE however splinter groups and some wierd sects in UTah that still believe in it. I think the US Govt prosecuted a famous one recently. they got him on a statutory rape charge IIRC since a couple of his "wives" were <~14 when he "married" them!
[ Reply ]
      but, the actual facts ruin the joke I know ... (n/t) by plblark2003-02-27 06:43:28
      Calling NOLAWitch... by Naruki2003-02-27 06:59:20
        did you notice my JEsus Christ by plblark2003-02-27 07:02:57
        Naruki-san is once again correct. by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 07:05:07
          ha ha ha and hmmm... by plblark2003-02-27 07:08:39
            Ye flipping Gods! That would be CRUEL! by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 07:18:37
              *ready boss* beaming now (n/t) by plblark2003-02-27 07:36:03
                THAT should teach those twerps by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 07:54:06
                  Prepping Rosie O'Donnell live feed... by Naruki2003-02-27 07:57:10
                    Hey, be nice to Rosie by slacktime2003-02-27 08:01:44
                      Until she got into costume, that is. by Naruki2003-02-27 08:05:29
              Isn't there something in the Geneva convention by radiowave9112003-02-27 10:01:22
                Precisely the point. by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 10:32:44
          I knew you'd appreciate it. :-) by Naruki2003-02-27 07:08:58
          Hey I am divided on this homosexuality thing by Spisefisken2003-02-27 07:18:09
            Pretend they're all big fat hairy ugly gals. by Naruki2003-02-27 07:21:16
              *lol* by Spisefisken2003-02-27 07:25:36
                Whatever doesn't turn you on. ;-) by Naruki2003-02-27 07:27:57
                  Sinead by JedaiBesk2003-02-27 07:38:59
                    Which song? by Avium2003-02-27 07:39:56
          Inteligent Chrisianity is possible. by pecosdave2003-02-27 07:35:37
            Not to be a nitpick but by slacktime2003-02-27 07:39:10
              exactly the type of history by pecosdave2003-02-27 07:42:47
                I have read by slacktime2006-11-19 12:55:59
        It just bugs me a little is all... by plblark2003-02-27 07:05:14
          At a guess, I'd say the "Jesus Christ" part. ;-P by Naruki2003-02-27 07:13:20
            heh! by plblark2003-02-27 07:34:23
              I'd have to disagree on that first sentence by Egaeus2003-02-27 08:08:38
                well, yes, if it WERE the word of god directly by plblark2003-02-27 08:22:06
                  yes by slacktime2003-02-27 08:27:00
                  So then by Egaeus2003-02-27 08:34:34
                    I think His rules are plain enough by slacktime2003-02-27 08:57:53
                      Wait a minute by Egaeus2003-02-27 09:05:56
                        Oh I don't disagree by slacktime2003-02-27 09:14:51
                          I agree by Egaeus2003-02-27 09:31:19
                            Maybe this will help by slacktime2003-02-27 10:00:50
                              To make it a better analogy... by Naruki2003-02-27 10:11:39
                                Ah but that is where you and I differ by slacktime2003-02-27 10:17:32
                                That's where you differ with about 90% of Xians. by Naruki2003-02-27 10:21:24
                                that's ok Naruki by slacktime2003-02-27 10:35:46
                                I shall now call you King Arthur... by Naruki2003-02-27 10:40:35
                                And the purpose of that post was...? by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:34:44
                                A sour spin and horribly incomplete. by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:22:48
                                And if the eldest refuses? by Naruki2003-02-27 10:28:35
                                The eldest didn't refuse. He voluneered. by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:31:25
                                Are you an idiot? by Naruki2003-02-27 10:37:39
                                I'm sorry that my analogy was flawed by slacktime2003-02-27 10:44:07
                                Ooh, very humble. by Naruki2003-02-27 10:45:07
                                Nitpick by Egaeus2003-02-27 12:07:24
                                Do you really want to know? by YakkoWarner2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                Actually he rebelled ... by cristobal2003-02-27 10:39:55
                                A sour spin and horribly incomplete. by Naruki2003-02-27 10:43:26
                                You sound bitter. by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:49:38
                                I know, I know ... by cristobal2003-02-27 10:51:29
                                But Jesus was the eldest and only begotten by Llyr2003-03-06 08:49:37
                              Not quite adequate by Egaeus2003-02-27 10:14:24
                                Maybe there is more to you by slacktime2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                But we keep coming to the question by Egaeus2003-02-27 10:47:53
                                Huh? by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:54:00
                                I think he was referring to this: by Spiff2003-02-27 11:01:52
                                I wonder what he thinks of Isaiah... ;) (n/t) by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:03:10
                                There's quite a difference by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:30:43
                                I'm still talking confusing style. by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:39:32
                                That's all I ask by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:43:33
                                Just the style by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:02:30
                                Too bad by slacktime2003-02-27 11:05:54
                                So God should change his style to suit us? by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:20:33
                                It seems that by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:29:14
                                So you *do* want a translation. by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:36:52
                                You are saying the Joe was 200 years old? by Naruki2003-02-27 11:53:02
                                I have no problem understanding by slacktime2003-02-27 12:14:06
                                Hold on... by Spiff2003-02-27 11:58:16
                                so knowledge removes freedom? by slacktime2003-02-27 10:58:10
                                That's the crux of the longtime debate by Nea2003-02-27 11:22:56
                                And we aren't likely going to solve it today? by slacktime2003-02-27 11:32:28
                                The latter option doesn't fly. by Arcanum2003-02-27 11:44:34
                                weakened omniscience by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:54:37
                                Yes. So is weakened omnipotence. :) by Arcanum2003-02-27 11:56:04
                                Turn it around by Ston2003-02-27 12:28:05
                                So he knows some things? by Egaeus2003-02-27 12:32:57
                                No by Ston2003-02-27 12:54:29
                                But if he knows the actions we will take by Egaeus2003-02-27 12:58:37
                                Because you're not getting it. by YakkoWarner2006-11-19 12:55:59
                                It didn't (n/t) by Egaeus2003-02-27 13:25:26
                                Nope, still doesn't work. by Arcanum2003-02-27 14:42:32
                                When we're talking about God, absolutely by Egaeus2003-02-27 11:34:35
                      Following the second one usually gets the police by Naruki2003-02-27 09:23:16
                        Hmmm by slacktime2003-02-27 09:34:49
                          Question by Egaeus2003-02-27 09:53:11
                            Who says it's a better translation? by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:02:41
                              Seems to be a need for "Christianity for Dummies". (n/t) by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 10:04:12
                              There's a host of them to choose from by Egaeus2003-02-27 10:22:05
                                Especially when the agenda was by Naruki2003-02-27 10:26:00
                                One problem with that by Egaeus2003-02-27 10:39:24
                                He he he. by Naruki2003-02-27 10:42:40
                                Actually wouldn't it be better by slacktime2003-02-27 10:49:02
                                Sure, but I heard He got the wrong wireless plan. by NOLAWitch2003-02-27 10:51:35
                                They've tried something similar by Egaeus2003-02-27 10:53:09
                            The KJV is as good a translation by slacktime2003-02-27 10:11:39
                              Wow, talk about missing the point. by Naruki2003-02-27 10:13:55
                                perhaps, no axe to grind... by slacktime2003-02-27 10:19:29
                                Whoosh! by Naruki2003-02-27 10:22:30
            Hey, I like sects. (n/t) by kelli2172003-02-27 07:40:51
              In, di, bi, or was that just a homophone? by Naruki2003-02-27 07:47:33
              ever been to a Christian chat room? by BlurOfSerenity2003-02-27 10:06:09
            I'm sorry... by walkon2003-02-27 10:29:45
              Um, YES!!! by Naruki2003-02-27 10:33:25
                Come on. by walkon2003-02-27 11:01:32
                  My estimation of BOTH groups goes down. by Naruki2003-02-27 11:37:31
                  But what about by Nea2003-02-27 11:38:53
          Question. by walkon2003-02-27 10:49:32
            Without getting too specific... by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 10:58:21
              Hmm. by walkon2003-02-27 11:02:59
                Yes, why? by YakkoWarner2003-02-27 11:25:14
              Unfortunately by slacktime2003-02-27 11:11:17
        But the LDS belief system is very mutable. by slacktime2003-02-27 07:32:18

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)