The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community

Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF

Forum Rules
& FAQ


Username

Password


Create a New Account

 
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

WANTED: some advice :-) by packet-rat2006-11-19 12:55:59
  Warning: Feeble graphics card. by LionsPhil2003-01-31 18:10:53
    well I plan by packet-rat2003-01-31 18:18:52
      make sure to get a SWITCH, not a hub (n/t) by surgo2003-01-31 18:22:19
        Hubs are cheaper. This guy's on a budget. by LionsPhil2003-01-31 18:23:05
          well as little as I understand by packet-rat2003-01-31 18:28:37
            It's a capacity issue ... by slamlander2003-01-31 19:56:04
              NICs by ripley82003-01-31 20:00:04
                Does it matter? They're a commodity by slamlander2003-01-31 20:38:28
                  Not usually, but it does sometimes. by Arcanum2003-01-31 21:27:52
                    yes and I have a personal by slamlander 2003-01-31 22:52:11
preference for 3com 3c905TXb, however, I've not seen any credible argument for on-board processor over off-board processing, since CPU speeds got past 500MHz. Modern comps are waaaayyy fat on CPU cycles.

Yes, the problem *is* I/O but not at the NIC. Those damned drives are too slow and then there are the backplanes. We don't need just fast burst transfer times, we need steady-state transfer rates of 1GBps and a backplane to handle double that, so I can drop in one of those drive arrays and 5 Gig-E cards and not bottle-neck the bus.

As it is, I can only get near reasonable disk throughput if I go with UltraRAID. Even then, if I install one UltraRAID card the back plane is already gagging and I have yet to install 1000baseTX cards, of which I usually need at least 2, sometimes 3.
[ Reply ]

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)