UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Least secure OS? Linux!	by Bealz	2006-11-19 12:55:59
It's suprising..	by Khaar	2003-01-13 15:06:29
I take offence to that.	by caffine-iv	2003-01-13 15:14:44
You take offense too easily.	by LionsPhil	2003-01-13 15:19:28
NT kernel is better	by ozanbaba	2003-01-13 15:22:48
XP is still much better than 9x/ME	by LionsPhil	2003-01-13 15:25:20
i agree but seems like someone	by ozanbaba	2003-01-13 15:27:07
They did. ;-)	by Avium	2003-01-13 20:02:49
Look at the timing of it all. ME came out only sightly before 2000 did. 2000 was supposed to be where the 9x family and the NT family finally merged. MS realised they weren't going to get 2000 out in time and rushed to create another 'crutch' OS : Windows ME. I believe the only reason it was created (or spawned if you prefer) was to boost sales in the quarter in which 2000 was supposed to be released. Must satisfy the stock-holders.
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)