|
Least secure OS? Linux! | by Bealz | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| Every fix opens a new hole, or so it seems |
by Bealz |
2003-01-13 14:26:45 |
| Don't try to tell me that every bug can be fixed immediately wuth a quick patch, it doesn't work that way. Patches take time to find and test.Top it off with open source and every nutcase looking for an exploit can find them faster than fixes can be found and tested. Give it up, ALL OS'es will be exploited, period. |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Never said they wouldn't be. | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:29:51 |
|
Or never at all... | by Freakazoid | 2003-01-13 14:31:28 |
|
Those fixes (for 95/98/Me) are called XP | by Bealz | 2003-01-13 14:37:18 |
|
Heehee | by LionsPhil | 2003-01-13 14:38:02 |
|
Sure it has. | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:39:28 |
|
that's where you're wrong | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 14:40:49 |
|
linux is user-friendly | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:42:58 |
|
Linux lets you shoot yourself in the foot | by LionsPhil | 2003-01-13 14:44:24 |
|
It +HAS+ a safety??? | by themadkansan | 2003-01-13 14:50:39 |
|
Yeah, don't go logging on as root for daily stuff. | by LionsPhil | 2003-01-13 14:52:06 |
|
and that applies doubly to your home box | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 14:53:24 |
|
Yup, I know. | by LionsPhil | 2003-01-13 15:02:14 |
|
executes a command | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 15:08:35 |
|
yes, it has a safety... | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 14:52:09 |
|
someone mension macOs i geuss it is | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:52:15 |
|
Windows has a dead-simple safety... | by swisscheese | 2003-01-13 15:29:09 |
|
that's precisely it! | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 14:45:43 |
|
for example | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:49:32 |
|
never try this at home (n/t) | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:50:57 |
|
Of course not, try it at uni first :) (n/t) | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:53:55 |
|
i will hehehehe (n/t) | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:54:42 |
|
Would you want an open panel on your microwave too | by Bealz | 2003-01-13 14:59:15 |
|
I don't follow your argument | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 15:00:47 |
|
Perhaps our definitions of ease of use is the | by Bealz | 2003-01-13 15:18:36 |
|
My mom uses Linux. | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 15:20:58 |
|
Linux installers generally say | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 15:09:11 |
|
Those b******s! | by LionsPhil | 2003-01-13 15:11:29 |
|
That explains a lot... | by SnArL | 2003-01-13 17:09:21 |
|
i remember that | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:39:41 |
|
Beats me, but if anyone leaves port 139 | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:42:55 |
|
s/96/95/; (n/t) | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:43:13 |
|
hehe or useless port 500 and others (n/t) | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:45:29 |
|
Considering the chances | by Khaar | 2003-01-13 14:44:28 |
|
i choose Linux cos i like the way it is | by ozanbaba | 2003-01-13 14:47:24 |
|
No, nor did I claim it was. | by caffine-iv | 2003-01-13 14:47:41 |
|
Sorry | by Khaar | 2003-01-13 15:04:16 |
|
all OSes will be exploited... | by mcnutcase | 2003-01-13 14:30:06 |
