The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
North Korea: a role model for the world? by slayer2003-01-13 10:35:27
  Question by hyzenthlay2003-01-13 10:53:06
    A sovereign nation by slayer2003-01-13 11:00:05
      The world is not a vacuum by hyzenthlay2003-01-13 11:06:35
        See this is what I mean by slayer 2003-01-13 11:13:31
when I say that war is sometimes the correct solution to a probem. It is within our rights as sovereign nations to impose embargoes, but it is also Korea's right to then secure trade through force. The resulting war is considered jutified by both sides, and an affective way to end the situation.

Under the UN, any sovereign nation can go to war to protect itself. If a trade ambargo means threatens a nation's existence, a nation is perfectly justified to go to war.
[ Reply ]
          I agree by hyzenthlay2003-01-13 11:16:11
          Securing trade through force by Taolie2003-01-13 11:26:01
            I disagree. by slayer2003-01-13 11:33:26
              Check the definition by Taolie2006-11-19 12:55:59
            I think there is a difference by MikeCDN2003-01-13 11:39:14
              I think we should beat slayer up anyway. by Naruki2003-01-13 11:42:54
                Well yeah, by MikeCDN2003-01-13 11:43:48
                Sounds good by rottweiler2003-01-13 11:43:51
                Excuse me, I have to go purchase some firearms :) (n/t) by slayer2003-01-13 12:00:01
                  too late... by rottweiler2003-01-13 12:01:29
                  *juggles tactical nuke* by LionsPhil2003-01-13 12:02:15
          War to protect one's nation by LurkerMo2003-01-13 11:49:36
            I dunno, you might have swayed me... by rottweiler2003-01-13 11:51:19
            It is not entirely different. by slayer2003-01-13 11:57:10
              Of course there is damage. by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:08:04
                No. by slayer2003-01-13 12:10:32
                  The international community by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:17:26
                    Please go look up anarchy. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:37:07
                      My definition of anarchy by LurkerMo2003-01-13 13:08:53
                        If "everybody" did "this"? by Naruki2003-01-13 13:27:43
                          I was trying to convey why I used by LurkerMo2003-01-13 13:37:50
                            By definition, yes. by Naruki2003-01-13 13:48:54
                              An overinflated ego. Probably from that gun. by LionsPhil2003-01-13 13:53:20
                              Damn. Here I thought I was getting by LurkerMo2003-01-13 14:23:57
                  Notice I didn't argue this point. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:17:51
                    The fact remains by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:31:35
                      No, that's not even close to being true. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:35:56
                        It is close enough for me. by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:53:59
                          Anarchy is no the refusal by slayer2003-01-13 12:58:51
                          Dictionary help by Taolie2003-01-13 12:59:53
                            Luser mode wins again! by LionsPhil2003-01-13 13:02:21

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)