The Daily Static
  The Daily Static
UF Archives
Register
UF Membership
Ad Free Site
Postcards
Community
Geekfinder
UFie Gear
Advertise on UF
Forum Rules
& FAQ

Username

Password


Create a New Account

  
 

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
North Korea: a role model for the world? by slayer2003-01-13 10:35:27
  Question by hyzenthlay2003-01-13 10:53:06
    A sovereign nation by slayer2003-01-13 11:00:05
      The world is not a vacuum by hyzenthlay 2003-01-13 11:06:35
If they choose to not fit in, they choose embargos. If they decide those embargos are harmful, and then go to war, and then get eliminated by the UN, they were still sovereign. At every point they had a choice.

They do not live in a vacuum. And the other sovereign nations can impose embargos if they want. Just because their are consequences for actions, does not mean no sovereignty.

They could also choose to move back to the dark ages and stop trade entirely.
[ Reply ]
        See this is what I mean by slayer2003-01-13 11:13:31
          I agree by hyzenthlay2003-01-13 11:16:11
          Securing trade through force by Taolie2003-01-13 11:26:01
            I disagree. by slayer2003-01-13 11:33:26
              Check the definition by Taolie2006-11-19 12:55:59
            I think there is a difference by MikeCDN2003-01-13 11:39:14
              I think we should beat slayer up anyway. by Naruki2003-01-13 11:42:54
                Well yeah, by MikeCDN2003-01-13 11:43:48
                Sounds good by rottweiler2003-01-13 11:43:51
                Excuse me, I have to go purchase some firearms :) (n/t) by slayer2003-01-13 12:00:01
                  too late... by rottweiler2003-01-13 12:01:29
                  *juggles tactical nuke* by LionsPhil2003-01-13 12:02:15
          War to protect one's nation by LurkerMo2003-01-13 11:49:36
            I dunno, you might have swayed me... by rottweiler2003-01-13 11:51:19
            It is not entirely different. by slayer2003-01-13 11:57:10
              Of course there is damage. by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:08:04
                No. by slayer2003-01-13 12:10:32
                  The international community by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:17:26
                    Please go look up anarchy. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:37:07
                      My definition of anarchy by LurkerMo2003-01-13 13:08:53
                        If "everybody" did "this"? by Naruki2003-01-13 13:27:43
                          I was trying to convey why I used by LurkerMo2003-01-13 13:37:50
                            By definition, yes. by Naruki2003-01-13 13:48:54
                              An overinflated ego. Probably from that gun. by LionsPhil2003-01-13 13:53:20
                              Damn. Here I thought I was getting by LurkerMo2003-01-13 14:23:57
                  Notice I didn't argue this point. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:17:51
                    The fact remains by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:31:35
                      No, that's not even close to being true. by Naruki2003-01-13 12:35:56
                        It is close enough for me. by LurkerMo2003-01-13 12:53:59
                          Anarchy is no the refusal by slayer2003-01-13 12:58:51
                          Dictionary help by Taolie2003-01-13 12:59:53
                            Luser mode wins again! by LionsPhil2003-01-13 13:02:21

 

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)