UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

Quick question for non-Americans:	by slayer	2002-12-27 05:59:39
Well, that would be a direct act of war	by Silvermoon82	2002-12-27 08:07:08
and the civilian casualties ("collateral damage" in military-speak) would likely be pretty bad... Diplomatic and economic sanctions against North Korea I can stand behind, but not killing civilians. Besides, the US still has nukes, and the fact that they never ratified the agreement outlawing them doesn't make that OK. This Canadian votes no.
[ Reply ]
Starve them or bomb them	by migiizis	2002-12-27 08:13:57
what if no civilians died?	by slayer	2002-12-27 08:15:33
Actually, considering the monster that	by Naruki	2002-12-27 08:19:49
Didn't Saddam try that too? (n/t)	by slayer	2002-12-27 08:23:12
I think he tried to claim it was not a	by Naruki	2002-12-27 08:33:48

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)