|
Quick question for non-Americans: | by slayer | 2002-12-27 05:59:39 |
|
Who's the real badguy? | by Trollax | 2002-12-27 06:49:29 |
|
You don't speak English, either, right? | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:06:06 |
|
Violence... | by Trollax | 2002-12-27 07:24:20 |
|
No one could have stopped Germany without war. | by slayer | 2002-12-27 07:30:54 |
| True! |
by non-US |
2002-12-27 07:43:15 |
True, you couldn't have stopped germany without force...
But here is another point - is there any way to stop the US of today without war?
Before you go there - I'm not suggestion Bush is a new Hitler, but what if? The US is so powerful today that it would take a united europe or asia to stop it, and this is the very reason why the US should be more carefull in it's international politics! Power corrupts...
And if you don't change your foreign policys you should at least change the words of the song to "land of the free and home of the double standards!"... :-)
And by the way, you shouldn't confuse natures law with international politics... Survival of the fittest is somewhat unethical when we are discussing nuclear weapons! ;-) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
"I'm not suggesting, but what if?" | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:45:06 |
|
Oh come on | by non-US | 2002-12-27 07:51:22 |
|
No. If you refuse to communicate as clearly as | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:59:37 |
|
Oh but I am better than you :-) | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:09:17 |
|
Nope, still a fallacy. "What if" makes it | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:17:45 |
|
Thanks | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:20:45 |
|
That's why I changed methods in my reply. | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:24:56 |
|
lol - ooookay... | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:27:51 |
|
Apply some more mental effort, | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:52:20 |
|
common English usage | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:29:34 |
|
Ah, but that isn't what was said. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:41:09 |
|
Rabbits | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:09:53 |
|
rabid fanatic? | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 09:05:23 |
|
Disguise? What disguise? | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 09:19:08 |
|
s'funny | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 10:15:24 |
|
Nope. | by flamebait | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
well then | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:22:41 |
|
Okay. Done. It means just what I thought it did. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:28:15 |
|
intentionally being obtuse won't help | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:31:59 |
|
Put those two "examples" in context. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 12:53:59 |
|
You are the one who is missing the point here. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 13:11:04 |
|
Lax language = a lax mind. | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:05:14 |
|
A period has gotten lost. If you see this | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:08:13 |
|
And flippin' AGAIN! This is embarrassing! (n/t) | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:08:59 |
|
It's over for tea with my auntie. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:11:14 |
|
Aunt Flo isn't visiting you this week? (n/t) | by nin_man | 2002-12-27 08:32:22 |
|
The very same! | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:34:59 |
|
I hope ONE of you isn't referring to | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:37:37 |
|
MY aunt? I thought she was YOUR aunt! | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:42:10 |
|
Does this mean you don't like broccoli/cranberry | by rottweiler | 2002-12-27 08:17:50 |
|
Ummm.... YEAH, it does! :+) | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:19:31 |
|
Sex laxar i en laxask | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:35:09 |
|
Among other things, "lax" means: | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:41:12 |
|
Hmmm... | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:55:56 |
|
you said | by slayer | 2002-12-27 07:57:06 |
|
Actually | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:03:04 |
|
Sorry, neglected to check the name on the reply :) | by slayer | 2002-12-27 08:10:07 |
|
No worries... | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:44:11 |
|
Avoiding war | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 09:09:32 |
