|
Quick question for non-Americans: | by slayer | 2002-12-27 05:59:39 |
| Who's the real badguy? |
by Trollax |
2002-12-27 06:49:29 |
The Idea that any form of violence is OK is just reprehensible in my book cruise missiles, car bombs, or otherwise. Violence is an act we commit when we have exhausted all other options, not because we've got an urge to satisfy or a military budget requirement to fulfil.
The war on terror isn't at all... It's a war OF terror. Bush couldn't get Osama, they haven't really wiped out any major terrorist threat (The Bali bombing would be a prime example) and really the pentagon will give the order weather or not the UN finds anything in Iraq...
America is little better than North Korea if it came down as a choice between the two I'd wouldn't take either. Besides north korea only started coming to the world's attention thanks to bush's "axis of evil" speech. What about the chinese occupation of Tibet? What about president Mogabe sanctioning the killing of farmers and the taking of their lands in Zimbabwe all based on race and color? What about Terrorist groups operating in Europe? What about the Subhuman status afforded to palestinians all througout the middle east? The "axis of evil" lies wherever there is money to be gained from conflict. North Korea is an excuse and so is Iraq...
-Trollax- |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
You don't speak English, either, right? | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:06:06 |
|
Violence... | by Trollax | 2002-12-27 07:24:20 |
|
Define violence before you pontificate on it. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:29:31 |
|
No one could have stopped Germany without war. | by slayer | 2002-12-27 07:30:54 |
|
True! | by non-US | 2002-12-27 07:43:15 |
|
"I'm not suggesting, but what if?" | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:45:06 |
|
Oh come on | by non-US | 2002-12-27 07:51:22 |
|
No. If you refuse to communicate as clearly as | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 07:59:37 |
|
Oh but I am better than you :-) | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:09:17 |
|
Nope, still a fallacy. "What if" makes it | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:17:45 |
|
Thanks | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:20:45 |
|
That's why I changed methods in my reply. | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:24:56 |
|
lol - ooookay... | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:27:51 |
|
Apply some more mental effort, | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:52:20 |
|
common English usage | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:29:34 |
|
Ah, but that isn't what was said. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:41:09 |
|
Rabbits | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:09:53 |
|
rabid fanatic? | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 09:05:23 |
|
Disguise? What disguise? | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 09:19:08 |
|
s'funny | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 10:15:24 |
|
Nope. | by flamebait | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
well then | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:22:41 |
|
Okay. Done. It means just what I thought it did. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 12:28:15 |
|
intentionally being obtuse won't help | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:31:59 |
|
Put those two "examples" in context. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 12:53:59 |
|
You are the one who is missing the point here. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 13:11:04 |
|
Lax language = a lax mind. | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:05:14 |
|
A period has gotten lost. If you see this | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:08:13 |
|
And flippin' AGAIN! This is embarrassing! (n/t) | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:08:59 |
|
It's over for tea with my auntie. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:11:14 |
|
Aunt Flo isn't visiting you this week? (n/t) | by nin_man | 2002-12-27 08:32:22 |
|
The very same! | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:34:59 |
|
I hope ONE of you isn't referring to | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:37:37 |
|
MY aunt? I thought she was YOUR aunt! | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:42:10 |
|
Does this mean you don't like broccoli/cranberry | by rottweiler | 2002-12-27 08:17:50 |
|
Ummm.... YEAH, it does! :+) | by adiplomat | 2002-12-27 08:19:31 |
|
Sex laxar i en laxask | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:35:09 |
|
Among other things, "lax" means: | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 08:41:12 |
|
Hmmm... | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:55:56 |
|
you said | by slayer | 2002-12-27 07:57:06 |
|
Actually | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:03:04 |
|
Sorry, neglected to check the name on the reply :) | by slayer | 2002-12-27 08:10:07 |
|
No worries... | by non-US | 2002-12-27 08:44:11 |
|
Avoiding war | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 09:09:32 |
|
who says it isn't evil? | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 09:01:48 |
|
I do, for one. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 09:22:55 |
|
if you don't believe in evil | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:18:07 |
|
Why would I substitute something? | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 12:51:11 |
|
disingenuous | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 13:10:48 |
|
Turn it around. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 13:18:22 |
|
BZZT! Wrongo. | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 13:37:33 |
|
What an assumption | by Ston | 2002-12-27 14:25:41 |
|
<sotto_voce>Just a little to the left... | by Naruki | 2002-12-27 14:41:27 |
|
Wow, that's a nice mug. | by flamebait | 2002-12-27 15:02:13 |
|
So Buddists don't eat? | by migiizis | 2002-12-27 09:34:56 |
|
LOL, i've often thought | by spacefiddle | 2002-12-27 12:20:40 |
|
A carrot has a more advanced nervous | by migiizis | 2002-12-27 12:50:36 |
|
Well put! (n/t) | by non-US | 2002-12-27 07:10:13 |
