Hardly. You have never met a real redneck if you think I argue their side. My arguments are usually intentionally inflamatory. Some points of view rarely get argued, and that, my friend, is wrong. All points of view should at least be considered, even if you have already dismissed them. For instance, here is an interesting point of view:
Why is HIV a world issue? It is not a large problem in my country. Does my country not constitute part of the world? And what do I care if it is a huge problem in the third world? If a good 80% of the third world died off, I would stop needing to put out for aide, and would have many more raw resources opened up for use.
So you tell me, why should I care if a people die off because of their own ignorance and provide me with more resources? I seriously want to know. You say this opinion is invalid because "the spread of HIV and AIDS is now a world issue of epidemic proportions." Now put it together for me. Why should I care? |
