|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
Stay out of my life! | by tms1791 | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
| ah hem |
by Arienadean |
2002-12-01 16:05:48 |
I don't think my ex *owes* me simply because I'm a woman... Let's see he repeatedly cheated on me during the marriage, stalked at least one other woman, raped me, messed with my head, etc... I think he owes me for life long damages I've incurred because of him. Take a look at my list of health stuff. I have medical reports that concur that several conditions are in relation to abuse I recieved. Also note I didn't cheat I abided by marital rules... as a consequence of him not I caught an std from him(thank god it was curable) which from talking to docs if my tube tie didn't sterilize me enough that illness did.(and I was borderline for PID after it)
Darn right on the splits for people living together. People intermingle stuff. Now if they can't agree on a fair split then yes it should be delt with in court. And no I don't expect it to lean for the womans end... as I said fair split. Same goes for custody and support. Support is based on two seperate issues. Children if any and which parent makes more also if any abuse took place and also custody goes on if any abuse took place, who wants the child and who has been the primary caregiver.(and who is most able to care for it depending on things) "Spousal" support is not for life afik. It depends on if there was abuse in some cases in others it considers if one was a stay at home and the other supported.(being a homemaker be it male or female is seen as work) They I think award an amount based on from 1/2 the time the couple was together up to same length of time to help them get back on their feet. Amounts depend on how much the person ordered to pay is making financial and can be adjusted due to financial changes.(note women can be order to pay men)
The property split despite misconduct is correct. Because some bring certain things into a relationship and should be aloud to leave with what they brought into it. However items that were bought as a couple or shared the court has to weigh several factors before awarding them... and couples can place a higher value on one item than another and negotiate who gets what.(in my case my ex tried to take everything and played with my head... It was nearly an even split but he did get the better end of things considering I brought more into the relationship and also considering his conduct.)
I believe step parents have a right to visitation. Just because they aren't bio parents don't mean they haven't formed a bond with the child or the child with them. Splits are traumatic enough on children as is without people forbidding them to see people they love. But I believe the support of the children is up to the bio parents or adoptive parent set. My ex had at least one child from messing about before me. My children are well aware of that child and I'd welcome that child into my home for visits, etc and would of treated it no diffrent than my own children. I also would of expected my ex to deal with his responsibilities to it. However the mother and child so far haven't sought him out since she found out she was preggers years ago.
Here the limit to be seen as common law spouses(which recives all rights afik as a legally married spouse) is 6 months. After that they have the same rights and are bound to the same things if they split. I think that is fair enough. Provided as I said if they split they take what they brought into it and evenly or reasonably divide the shared property.
I don't think they should eliminate the emtiontional and subjective factors in deciding custody. And no it doesn't only side with a mother. Many parents where I am anyways both work so spend about equal time with the child, or they also have stay at home fathers. The courts here afik can't bias on gender. They also depending on age of the child talk to the child and try to also observe the bonds between child and parent... I know been there as I've been through custody hearings.
On college education I think that ones debateable. Not all children will be able to go to colledge and such or wish to. As for special needs kids I believe neither parent can bail and should take responsibility for what care that child will require. (I've argued this in court with my ex and he's tried to get out of it... for now the court case was stayed due to my daughter being so ill before... but the judge at the time seemed to agree and also think my ex a twit by the way she told him off in court one day) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
