|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
For Naruki | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:02:05 |
|
Um, Naruki, what did you do to set him off? | by thndrcloud | 2002-10-18 11:54:06 |
|
Hard to say, exactly. | by Naruki | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
"truth==perception" | by mirage | 2002-10-18 17:47:23 |
|
Not very good. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 18:03:04 |
| Why not? |
by mirage |
2002-10-18 18:27:55 |
1) reality: that which is.
2) reality: that which is perceived.
To me, those are equivalent, although 2 is a bit clearer. As for 1: How do we determine what is? Perception. Can we ever determine "that which is" outside of our own perceptions? No. We can gain a more coherent version of reality by combining multiple perceptions, since there are no independent observers within our universe.
Reality is dependent upon my (and others) perception, so I could be nothing more than a computer program, although, since this is not verified by multiple perceptions, I do not accept this as a coherent perception of reality.
How can we seperate reality from perception? |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Ha ha ha. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 18:45:04 |
|
But | by mirage | 2002-10-18 19:16:40 |
|
What? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 19:27:35 |
|
All things | by mirage | 2002-10-18 20:07:22 |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
