| For Naruki |
by rwrannells |
2002-10-18 10:02:05 |
First:
Since you seem to think that truth and fact are equivelent, consider the following. Given that person A is convicted of crime B. It is both true and a fact that the person A was convicted of crime B. It is also true that person A committed crime B. It is not a fact that person A committed crime B. If you need further supporting evidence of this Naruki, take a look at the large number convictions that have been overturned due to DNA testing.
QED
Second:
Please classify the following three statements as either true of false. Please state any additional givens that you use in answering.
1) Given line A and point P not on line A. There are no lines parallel to A passing through point P.
2) Given line A and point P not on line A. There is exactly one line parallel to A passing through point P.
3) Given line A and point P not on line A. There are an infinite number of lines parallel to A passing through point P.
Third:
You seem to dislike arbitrary rules for debate and appear not to accept Roberts Rules of Order as rules for debate. There are other codifications for rules of debate, would you like to suggest one of them? Do you wish to state your own rules?
|
|
[ Reply ] |
|
I'm not Naruki, | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:06:30 |
|
Wrong (n/t) | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:14:04 |
|
Right (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:14:58 |
|
That's not fair. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 10:18:23 |
|
I like maths questions. Well, some of them. =) (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:19:04 |
|
Your Lack of Education is Showing | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:20:40 |
|
Your Total And Utter Stupidity Is Showing [sic] | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:35:15 |
|
That's no fair, either. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 10:46:05 |
|
In that case, we "win" be default ;P (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:48:31 |
|
Question 2:All Three are True | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:53:01 |
|
Where's your quotation from Roberts Rules? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 10:55:04 |
|
I Defer to You, Naruki | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:33:28 |
|
LIAR! | by Naruki | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Don't Want to Take the Time | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:54:39 |
|
I will accept... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:15:01 |
|
Sorry | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:25:14 |
|
Why be sorry, Liar? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:34:38 |
|
Yes. Link. | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:55:13 |
|
Actually, what he said there is technically | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 10:57:12 |
|
Ok then, here's a question for rwrannells | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 11:01:31 |
|
Answers | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:18:42 |
|
No, your question was incomplete. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:21:01 |
|
How? | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:37:30 |
|
I've given you the link, genius. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:46:31 |
|
spherical geometry | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 10:55:52 |
|
Depends on the Definitions | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:28:37 |
|
Wow | by syren | 2002-10-18 10:06:54 |
|
Heh heh heh >=) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:08:00 |
|
Not Really | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:13:05 |
|
So...Naruki is no more than clutter... | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:16:06 |
|
i say again - wow | by syren | 2002-10-18 10:17:02 |
|
Simply Looking for Ground Rules | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:23:10 |
|
Naruki is, | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 10:39:12 |
|
Well, what we usually have here | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 10:53:56 |
|
I tend to agree | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:53:42 |
|
No, you made an absurd statement. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:07:05 |
|
What Statement was Obsurd? (n/t) | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:15:41 |
|
Why are you asking me? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:16:54 |
|
Oops, sorry about that | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:27:12 |
|
Ah, that absurd statement. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:33:45 |
|
I See | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 13:49:48 |
|
Provide the actual text. | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 13:55:40 |
|
He can't. I gave him a direct link to the last | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:04:15 |
|
Not Possible | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:05:51 |
|
Can I call em or can I call em? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:09:14 |
|
Worthless terminology. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 14:30:39 |
|
That's the Key to It | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:45:37 |
|
Only when perception is correct. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:49:08 |
|
In the example your professor gave | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 14:54:46 |
|
Wrong. The key is | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 14:59:24 |
|
Dearest | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 12:18:54 |
|
Cool. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:22:00 |
|
It's a realm of eternal not-quite darkness | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 12:34:37 |
|
I looked it up. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:32:35 |
|
You say the sweetest things | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 13:44:58 |
|
The word you used, however... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:01:33 |
|
Only if tigerworks insulted hir for *not* liking | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 14:05:30 |
|
She | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 14:35:06 |
|
Sorry | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 16:02:47 |
|
True | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 14:40:50 |
|
But that doesn't peg me as the type. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:45:54 |
|
I never said you were | by tigermouse | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Starting out annoyed, | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 12:07:29 |
|
what does... | by Thalas_shaya | 2002-10-18 11:14:25 |
|
I was wondering that myself | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 11:47:56 |
|
I Thought that was Self Evident | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:57:29 |
|
No, the truth doesn't change. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:12:42 |
|
Nothing Postulated | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:22:36 |
|
Ooops replace space with geometry (n/t) | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:23:21 |
|
Hey, Einstein... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:27:53 |
|
Which Pocket? (n/t) | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:29:09 |
|
What pockets? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:27:46 |
|
I *really* didn't want to know that. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 14:02:30 |
|
<Pervert>Tell me more about your nudity.</Pervert> | by NOLAWitch | 2002-10-18 14:06:59 |
|
It's very embarrassing... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:08:09 |
|
Wuss | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 14:15:04 |
|
No... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:20:13 |
|
Woohoo! Naruki's NEKKID! | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 14:33:33 |
|
Here are a couple definitions of truth... | by skeegenin | 2002-10-18 10:14:44 |
|
Good Points | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:31:45 |
|
Negative. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 10:34:50 |
|
Exactly. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:35:49 |
|
Differences only Symantic | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 11:02:24 |
|
It depends. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 11:14:17 |
|
ooooooh, good distinction (n/t) | by Thalas_shaya | 2002-10-18 11:16:42 |
|
Except that it kills the meaning. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:27:42 |
|
Fair enough... | by Thalas_shaya | 2002-10-18 11:34:23 |
|
That's not a lie. That's why they | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:41:16 |
|
I would | by Ston | 2002-10-18 14:32:27 |
|
My Point Exactly | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:03:11 |
|
In order to argue semantics... | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:09:16 |
|
No, not quite the same. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 12:12:43 |
|
Does That Mean | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:18:48 |
|
Methane is glibbertine. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:20:00 |
|
Not exactly. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 12:26:46 |
|
I Think We are Getting Somewhere | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:37:14 |
|
In that case... | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 12:59:01 |
|
Perception vs reality | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 10:36:02 |
|
Metaphysics | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:13:29 |
|
Semantics, you idiot! | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:16:12 |
|
Well | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 12:31:27 |
|
Agreed | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:45:51 |
|
I would call that knowledge | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 13:02:35 |
|
OK | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 13:42:29 |
|
Knowledge != ability. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:58:52 |
|
Incorrect | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:13:15 |
|
ROFL! | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:16:01 |
|
Look It Up | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:18:39 |
|
Hey, Wordsworth. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:23:43 |
|
You have sunk pretty low | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 14:11:27 |
|
If You Disagree | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:17:40 |
|
If you can't spell, stop screwing around | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:19:40 |
|
Dictionary.com | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:25:32 |
|
Amazing! | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:28:40 |
|
I hope so. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 16:15:26 |
|
Actual and factual are not equivalent. | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 14:44:01 |
|
knowledge | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 14:24:28 |
|
Excellent | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 14:42:48 |
|
Again, I insist that "or" doesn't indicate | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 14:56:40 |
|
Now he's got you doing it. | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 15:06:46 |
|
Well, I didn't want to get into what I thought | by tigermouse | 2002-10-18 15:20:46 |
|
"Confirmity with fact AND reality" | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 10:42:26 |
|
Beat me to the punch. (n/t) | by skeegenin | 2002-10-18 10:46:45 |
|
Conjunctive failure. | by skeegenin | 2002-10-18 10:44:18 |
|
Maybe an Example will help | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:55:40 |
|
It is widely believed to be both. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 13:07:35 |
|
Exactly | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 13:20:52 |
|
I don't see your point. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 13:25:04 |
|
It is true | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 13:09:28 |
|
Even if you don't believe that trains | by NOLAWitch | 2002-10-18 13:40:48 |
|
Not at all. | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 13:52:44 |
|
He he he. That's a fact. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:56:59 |
|
at first this looked like something worth reading | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 10:20:13 |
|
But it's so much *fun* to play with trolls 8) (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:21:22 |
|
true---but it was such a nice Friday until now. (n (n/t) | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 10:23:21 |
|
It's Friday? | by bugarup | 2002-10-18 10:24:25 |
|
Ummm....yeah!! | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 10:26:24 |
|
Can i poke him with a long sharp stick?? (n/t) | by syren | 2002-10-18 10:21:41 |
|
if you think it's worth your time....but why? (n/t | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 10:22:45 |
|
Only if I can too. (n/t) | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:22:48 |
|
Done and done!! | by syren | 2002-10-18 10:27:34 |
|
3...2...1... | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:33:49 |
|
Sorry to correct you on this. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 10:44:34 |
|
...and is making. | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 10:47:06 |
|
ahhh | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 11:00:05 |
|
Nice, subtle way of telling me that I screwed up | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 11:05:33 |
|
no worries.... | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 11:08:54 |
|
From dictionary.com: | by Buffy_Fett | 2002-10-18 11:14:41 |
|
Well, I was thinking as "screw up" being | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 11:44:14 |
|
I think you're right. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:45:43 |
|
From the same source: | by Buffy_Fett | 2002-10-18 12:41:26 |
|
I can't speak for Naruki, | by flamebait | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
That's it exactly. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:24:06 |
|
Bear in mind | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 10:45:27 |
|
got it.... | by gatorbytes | 2002-10-18 11:02:47 |
|
ROFL! | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 10:25:46 |
|
No, it is NOT true that person A commited crime B. | by Arcanum | 2002-10-18 10:27:04 |
|
Almost Correct | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 10:48:16 |
|
Not true | by nimdokk | 2002-10-18 10:42:52 |
|
That is my Point | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 13:07:33 |
|
You are right, | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 13:46:54 |
|
thats | by nimdokk | 2002-10-18 20:46:32 |
|
On Robert's Rules of Order | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 10:57:55 |
|
Oh crud! I left out a </b> tag. | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 10:59:40 |
|
I believe that you are correct. | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 11:02:53 |
|
If Naruki said it | by flamebait | 2002-10-18 11:10:53 |
|
He he he. Maybe I'm really arguing with Dumbya. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 11:18:59 |
|
Um, Naruki, what did you do to set him off? | by thndrcloud | 2002-10-18 11:54:06 |
|
Hard to say, exactly. | by Naruki | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Took a little while but I think I get it | by thndrcloud | 2002-10-18 12:21:32 |
|
See? There are two points. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 12:26:59 |
|
Your conclusion is only partly true | by thndrcloud | 2002-10-18 12:36:23 |
|
Hmmm.... | by BuggedEyes | 2002-10-18 13:02:06 |
|
Incorrect. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 13:23:37 |
|
Misperception | by thndrcloud | 2002-10-18 13:53:22 |
|
Gotcha. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 14:07:26 |
|
"truth==perception" | by mirage | 2002-10-18 17:47:23 |
|
Not very good. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 18:03:04 |
|
Why not? | by mirage | 2002-10-18 18:27:55 |
|
Ha ha ha. | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 18:45:04 |
|
But | by mirage | 2002-10-18 19:16:40 |
|
What? | by Naruki | 2002-10-18 19:27:35 |
|
All things | by mirage | 2002-10-18 20:07:22 |
|
I'm sorry... | by special_ed | 2002-10-18 12:49:36 |
|
Don't Know | by rwrannells | 2002-10-18 12:57:12 |
|
Check here. | by special_ed | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Hmm... | by LionsPhil | 2002-10-18 16:41:26 |
|
Yes, and the concept of... | by skeegenin | 2002-10-18 19:37:02 |
|
No it | by mirage | 2002-10-18 20:11:03 |
|
Then give it a different name. | by skeegenin | 2002-10-18 21:03:30 |
