UserFriendly Strip Comments


	The Daily Static UF Archives Register UF Membership Ad Free Site Postcards Community Geekfinder UFie Gear Advertise on UF Forum Rules & FAQ Username Password Create a New Account

Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index

I can't believe i'm going to ask this here	by Glytch78	2002-10-18 07:30:02
AMD with DDR.	by caffine-iv	2002-10-18 07:34:41
AMD XP 2400 vs Intel P4 2.4Ghz@533	by Glytch78	2002-10-18 07:36:50
GHz wise, the P4. Power wise, the 2400.	by caffine-iv	2002-10-18 07:38:59
EH??	by Glytch78	2002-10-18 07:42:14
The marketing machine claims another victim.	by taIon	2002-10-18 09:03:41
Other than x86 processors everything else is at far slower clocks. 500MHz apple isn't 1/4 of the speed of a 2G P4. Not by a long way. The P4 was designed with one thing in mind, to bury AMD in the MHz war. I worked. As long as intel can keep people thinking MHz=performance then they win. Educating the public is impossible which is why AMD try to hide the actual clock speed these days. Unfortunatly all the "technical" press like pointing out the clock speeds and so comusumers think that it actually matters. Same as with DDR RAM, they now use silly numbers for the different speeds or claim that it's twice the clock speed that it actually is. Why do they do this? Because it's easier then trying to explain that at the same speed it goes twice as fast (but the same latency) as normal SDRAM. [/rant of the day]
[ Reply ]

[Todays Cartoon Discussion] [News Index]

Come get yer ARS (Account Registration System) Source Code here!
All images, characters, content and text are copyrighted and trademarks of J.D. Frazer except where other ownership applies. Don't do bad things, we have lawyers.
UserFriendly.Org and its operators are not liable for comments or content posted by its visitors, and will cheerfully assist the lawful authorities in hunting down script-kiddies, spammers and other net scum. And if you're really bad, we'll call your mom. (We're not kidding, we've done it before.)