|
|
Back to UserFriendly Strip Comments Index
|
New wrench thrown in the wheel | by crash_ | 2006-11-19 12:55:59 |
|
Well | by hyzenthlay | 2002-07-12 07:46:48 |
|
But that's just it, kids aren't forced to say it | by crash_ | 2002-07-12 07:55:27 |
|
The courts determined | by hyzenthlay | 2002-07-12 08:00:08 |
|
What about the response | by slayer | 2002-07-12 08:08:10 |
|
Not my impression | by hyzenthlay | 2002-07-12 08:13:45 |
|
What I have seen | by slayer | 2002-07-12 08:20:03 |
|
With your eyes closed, no doubt. | by Naruki | 2002-07-12 08:37:46 |
|
Historical | by slayer | 2002-07-12 08:47:53 |
| Constitutional? |
by hyzenthlay |
2002-07-12 08:52:15 |
"The thing is, when you look at precedent, you see the pledge is in all likelihood consitutional"
I was constitutional, it may not be now. Since the Supreme Court 'interperates' the constitution that interperatation is apparently suject to change. I cna see that it appears to be a government endorsement of religion, maybe not a specific religion, but religion. And I think that you could read the constitution to say that that is not ok.
I wanna go back to 'E Pluribus Unum' on the money. Much more meaningful that 'In God we Trust.' (Which I guess we don't or why do we have welfare?) |
|
[ Reply ] |
|
Hm... I wonder if I can "interpret" | by xti | 2002-07-12 10:26:41 |
|
If ... | by hyzenthlay | 2002-07-12 10:48:35 |
|
Rational arguments? xti? | by Arcanum | 2002-07-12 10:50:38 |
|
Well that, and shooting homeless people (n/t) | by hyzenthlay | 2002-07-12 10:56:01 |
|
You know, on most levels | by Naruki | 2002-07-12 11:08:53 |
|
Okay, so then my mortgage company's | by xti | 2002-07-12 12:36:02 |
|
|
[Todays Cartoon Discussion]
[News Index]
|
|
