is not the applicable one. Rights are not "that which is just, morally good, legal, proper, or fitting", that is the definition of "right" as opposed to "wrong". The appropriate definition is:
6.
a. Something that is due to a person or governmental body by law, tradition, or nature.
Second, Naruki doesn't deny the existance of rights, just the notion that they are somehow derived from some supernatural being.
Third, do you really want what is desireable in nature? Nature is cruel to the weak and defenseless.
Lastly, you have what rights society grants you, no more, no less. |